is it a sin to give birth from dead fathers?

Question

u all heard of wives n gf keeping sperm donations just in case their loved ones don come back from war. is this immoral or just not fair to the child?

Answer 1

First of all, I agree with you that it is pretty unfair to a kid to be born without a father, just because a wife wanted to have something forever from her husband. (Actually, in Deuteronomy 25:5-10, there is a concept that if a man dies without children his wife marries her husband's bother.)
I can't tell you about other religions' laws, but according to Jewish law, from what I've seen and heard, it is technically okay. Interestingly, there is a question of "who is the father?", for a few reasons that I am sure that I don't understand, so I won't attempt to write them.
Actually, in Israel a few years ago, there was a case of a woman whose husband was killed in a car accident, and she wanted the doctors to remove some sperm from him to become pregnant from him. The medical ethics/Rabbinic authorities didn't allow it.

Answer 2

Only God can tell if it is sin or not.

That being said, is it prudent? It would boil down to the decision of the mother and the father as to whether or not they should do so.

Is it fair to the child? No worse than when a parent dies that is not involved in military service (in my opinion).

Parents die everyday - and children learn to adapt and compensate. It is part of life for some.

Answer 3

i've got faith you are going to be able to correctly be relating a passage in Ezekiel that talks bearing directly to the non-public duty for the sins one commits - as properly to asserting that the son isn't in charge for the sins of the daddy, it additionally says the daddy isn't in charge for the sins of the son. In different words, the son won't be in a position to be punished for the sins of the daddy (and any incorrect way around too.) working example, the son isn't put in penitentiary today via fact the daddy robs somebody. even nevertheless it does no longer recommend that the son isn't plagued via the effect of the sins of the daddy - working example, he now no longer has his father at abode to teach him to play baseball or to grant for him. The doctrine of "unique sin" isn't a lot bearing directly to the particular sins that Adam committed yet bearing directly to the effect of that sin that all and sundry via fact that Adam has "inherited" - certainly one of those effects is the sin nature - the character to sin is what leads us all into in spite of particular sins we would commit. whilst Adam & Eve committed that first sin then sin became area of their nature and that they exceeded it alongside to us. So we are all now born with the character to sin and that nature develops very early on in our lives. working example, the small baby who sneaks the cookie out of the cookie jar - and till now all and sundry says that they don't comprehend good from incorrect enable me ask - why do they sneak it in the event that they don't comprehend that they might desire to no longer do it? besides, my factor is that the son is to no longer be punished for the sins of the daddy yet would be plagued via those sins and area of the effect we've is that all of us proceed to stay with in Adam's footsteps and commit sins. Sin separates us from God yet Jesus became the bridge to hold us back including Him. As for why God can't forgive guy? He does. Jesus died on the bypass so as that we ought to get carry of that forgiveness and be reconciled to God and He rose from the lifeless so as that we ought to inherit eternal existence. i wish this enables you recognize most of the failings you asked.