I'd vote for him too. He wouldn't be the first non-christian I voted for, and I do agree with a lot of his views.
2007-03-29 06:31:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rossonero NorCal SFECU 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
He HAS wavered on the issues like abortion, homosexuality, etc. I repeat, he HAS wavered! I know because I had the misfortune of having had him as governor of my state. He is a snake oil salesman. He blows into town, will say anything to get whatever he wants and then blow out of town in the blink of an eye.
I've often wondered how "religious" he is. He rarely mentions his faith much or been seen in a Church. Come to think of it, I think I have seen more photographs of Clinton at Church. Even though she doesn't mention it much, there have been reports that she regularly attends Methodist Church services.
And if people are going to make Christianity a factor, then everyone should vote for John Edwards. He is the one who most emulates Jesus Christ. His work on behalf of the poor and his deep devotion to his family make Romney looks like the devil. When Romney's wife, Ann, became ill with MS, he didn't miss a beat in continuing to be the snake oil salesman. He and his wife led very separate lives. When his wife was covered on the local news, Mitt was nowhere to be found. He wasn't there for his wife and he wasn't there for Massachusetts. As far as the poor and ordinary folk go, he couldn't kick them out onto the street fast enough.
The only person Mitt Romney cares about is Mitt Romney. Don't be fooled by the plastic veneer. He doesn't have the common sense and decency of McCain, the toughness and skills of Giuliani, the brains and instincts of Clinton or the heart and soul of Edwards.
And if you "can't play games with God regarding homosexuality & abortion" then how do you do so with polygamy and engaging in sexual intercourse with prepubescent/adolescent girls? Some Mormons still do this today! Romney may not be one of them but has his own dirty record, like hiring illegals, cutting funding off for the disabled and handicapped, denying our first line of defense (firemen and police) the equipment they need to their job, etc. The list goes on and on. Do not be fooled by the wolf in sheep’s clothing!
2007-03-29 10:21:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Curious 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would!! Hands down. He has never once said he is either for abortion or homosexuality. He has always either stood against both, or not wanted to open a debate about his beliefs. He is a very good man, and is very much for the people. He puts religion aside to do what needs doing, and is willing to give to people without taking anything for himself. Just so you know, HE IS CHRISTIAN!!!!!!! He may not have the exact same views you do, but he believes in Christ, that Christ is our savior and our redeemer. He believes in the bible, and he does read it. Mormons aren't a cult! Sorry to tell you all. I think those people who are against him should look at his track record in congress and in the legislature and see what he is all about. He gave up his pay for a whole term to change the deficit in his state!! I don't think Hillary would do anything like that ever!! If it came down to the two of them, I would vote for Mitt. He's more a christian then Hillary is!!
2007-03-29 07:57:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by odd duck 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
If it would come down to Mitt or Hillary, I would have to think about it. I would never vote for Hillary, but I don't know if I could cast my vote for Mitt either. It's just to convenient that now that he is running for President his is now against abortion and same sex marriage. I don't like politicians that flip flop on issues. For the voters to trust them the have to take a stand on something and stay there. In the end I would probably vote for an independent candidate who's views closely resemble mine.
2007-03-29 06:38:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by MistyAnn 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
II think he is the only person who will really take charge with these issues.
Some people say well he changed his opinions on these matters. Personally I think abortion is wrong it should have never been created but now it is and I am sure if we should force others not to be able to have one. Now that it is available they have the freedom to choose, and I do not know if we can stop that. Hopefully America will make it illegal, but people will still find away.
2007-03-29 06:35:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by divinity2408 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mitt Romney, if he holds to the e book of Mormon - believes that darkish pores and skin is a curse by technique of God and that American Indians descended from Israel. How all of us, Christian, atheist, Jew, can vote for someone who believes stuff like that is previous me. Mormons opt for desperately to be called "Christians," besides the indisputable fact that the reality is: LDS is a CULT. Kingdom of the Cults, by technique of Walter Martin, explains why all suitable. Oh, they even believe God the daddy got here down from heaven and had actual sex with Mary to furnish Jesus! heavily, you won't be able to make this stuff up. staggering Mormons!
2016-12-02 23:37:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's the back and forth on the issues that I don't like.. Can we really trust that he is not going to turn again? His religion I could care less about. I have to start out with a man of twisting conviction on these important issues... Jim
2007-03-29 06:52:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. Romney seems like a used car salesman... he's smooth, slick, and charismatic and makes things sound good... but not sure he's really going to deliver.
2007-03-29 06:37:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by peacetimewarror 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Absolutely, I would. We are voting for chief executive not chief theologian. I don't care what faith he is, I like his politics.
2007-04-01 09:56:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by David G 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Mormonism is a cult:
http://www.exmormon.org/tract2.htm
2007-03-29 06:39:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋