English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you think God would have wanted hundreds and thousands of trees to be cut down and wild life to die, in order to make the paper that is used to print the bible on?

2007-03-28 16:05:17 · 8 answers · asked by fish for a day 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

8 answers

I don't think God wouldn't like His creation to be messed up. But i do think God make a lot of sacrifices for His dearest creation and that is Humankind. And seeing trees being cut down in order to make the paper that is used to print the bible on is God's one sacrifices to reach the people and spread the good news and love for us. Just like when He sent His only begotten Son to save us.

2007-03-28 16:11:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

we could let the rabbits reproduce at such an alarming rate that they eat all the vegetation and we starve and die. Have you read the Bible at all to see that we are to manage the animals? I will agree about pushing them to extinction or for greed purposes. old trees die eventually so controlled cutting would be wise. Total de forestation is a problem however. Man kind is not a well disciplined bunch of people but I as a Christian am working on it. By the way I'm a carpenter and the roof over your head is made out of trees.

2007-03-28 23:15:13 · answer #2 · answered by Dennis James 5 · 0 0

Come on. You're talking about the guy who had a son, just to have him die. He's a pretty mean character.

2007-03-28 23:12:23 · answer #3 · answered by joshnya68 4 · 0 0

Of course not. But the nonchristians were going to print porn anyway, so why not make the best of man messing up the forest.

2007-03-28 23:08:18 · answer #4 · answered by awayforabit 5 · 1 1

Absolutely.

He created the trees; there can't be a better purpose for them

2007-03-28 23:09:24 · answer #5 · answered by Free To Be Me 6 · 1 0

first of all, it is the woodcutters' choice to cut trees legally or ilegally. well, the Creator owns them anyway.

2007-03-28 23:21:37 · answer #6 · answered by alexis a 2 · 0 0

i wiould hink not, but environmentally, it has to be done. other than writing on bark or in sand, what else do we have to write on?

2007-03-28 23:11:31 · answer #7 · answered by canteringfool 2 · 0 0

Yes duh

2007-03-28 23:18:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers