English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Well I was just watching some of borat's videos on youtube, making fun of the american & jewis people (by the way his jewish himself)and I read some of the comments. So as I was scrolling through I came across alot of comments about the RAF being stronger than the American airforce and the british marines being better trained than american marines.

So I was just wondering if this is true? Because I thought that America has the best aero technology and are the most rigorous at training there troops!!!! especially there special forces.

2007-03-28 14:38:49 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

10 answers

Brits have way better soldiers. The British Army is without a doubt is the best army in the world. It may not always have the best equipment and technology, but the British army has definitely got the best trained, most skilled and professional soldiers in all the world.

The SAS are without doubt the best special services in the world, not the Navy SEALs. The SAS have a brilliant track record of success after success playing huge roles across the world.

-------------------------------

The U.S. have high-tech military technologies. But again, US Army relies too heavily on technology.

------------------------------

For the airforce, Israeli pilots are the best !

2007-03-28 15:45:39 · answer #1 · answered by Rick 3 · 0 1

I was stationed at RAF Brawdy Wales, its one of the main training wings in the RAF. I was there for 3 years (US Navy) and without a doubt the USAF is better trained, have better equipment, and more important, more time in the air. If your talking about flying the Harrier, the RAF has the upper hand but they designed and built the plane.

As for the question about the Marines, its a toss up. We're were given training by the Royal Marines because we had to support (security wise) our own building. No Marines allowed! Depending on the situation, I would have to say the RM would have the upper hand, man per man. In other areas, the US Marines would have the upper hand. In either case, I wouldn't want to be on the wrong side of either one.

I'm 4th generation Navy (OT2). As my Dad (FTC in WWII) would say they(Marines) were nothing but "A bunch of Sea Going Bell Hops!"! BTW, his ship was sunk at the Slot, it took 58 hits in 15 minutes, half the crew was killed. There were more sailors killed that night than at Pearl. He spent 3 days in the water before being picked up.

2007-03-28 14:54:27 · answer #2 · answered by ZRX1200 4 · 0 1

My only answer as to why the Marines get the toughest jobs is because the average Leatherneck is a much better fighter. He has far more guts, courage, and better officers... These boys out here have a pride in the Marine Corps and will fight to the end no matter what the cost.
2nd Lt. Richard C. Kennard, Peleliu, World War II

Why in hell can't the Army do it if the Marines can. They are the same kind of men; why can't they be like Marines.
Gen. John J. "Black Jack" Pershing, USA; 12 February 1918

Don't you forget that you're First Marines! Not all the communists in Hell can overrun you!
Col. Lewis B. "Chesty" Puller, USMC
rallying his First Marine Regiment near Chosin Reservoir, Korea, December 1950


"I can't say enough about the two Marine divisions. If I use words like brilliant, it would really be an under-description of the absolutely superb job they did in breaching the so-called impenetrable barrier. . .Absolutely superb operation, a textbook, and I think it'll be studied for many, many years to come as the way to do it." (General H. Norman Schwarzkopf, USA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 27 February 1991.)

"I have just returned from visiting the Marines at the front, and there is not a finer fighting organization in the world." (General Douglas MacArthur, USA, outskirts of Seoul, 21 September 1950.)

"Casualties many; Percentage of dead not known; Combat efficiency; we are winning." (Colonel David M. Shoup, USMC, Tarawa, 21 November 1943.)

"The deadliest weapon in the world is a MARINE and his rifle!"
GEN. PERSHING, US.ARMY

"We're surrounded. That simplifies the problem!"
CHESTY PULLER, USMC

"The more MARINES I have around the better I like it!"
GEN. MARK CLARK, U.S. ARMY

"I want you boys to hurry up and whip these Germans so we can get out to the Pacific to kick the s**t out of the purple-pissing Japanese, before the Godda**ed MARINES get all the credit!" Lt General George Patton, US Army 1945

""The MARINES have landed and have the situation well in hand!"
RICHARD HARDING DAVIS

"Casualties many; Percentage of dead not known; Combat efficiency: we are winning!"
COL. DAVID M. SHOUP, USMC

"I can never again see a UNITED STATES MARINE without experiencing a feeling of reverence."
GEN. JOHNSON, U.S. ARMY

"The raising of that flag on Suribachi means a MARINE CORPS for the next 500 years."
JAMES FORRESTAL, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY

"Come on, you sons of b*****! Do you want to live forever?"
GySgt. DANIEL DALY, USMC

"We're not retreating, Hell! We're just attacking in a different direction!"
GEN. OLIVER SMITH, USMC

"I have just returned from visiting the MARINES at the front, and there is not a finer fighting organization in the world!"
GEN. DOUGLAS MACARTHUR, U.S. ARMY

"Teufelhunde! (Devil Dogs)"
GERMAN SOLDIERS, WW1 at BELLEAU WOOD

"So they've got us surrounded, good! Now we can fire in any direction, those b*****ds won't get away this time!"
CHESTY PULLER, USMC

"We have two companies of MARINES running all over this island and thousands of ARMY troops doing nothing!"
GEN. JOHN VESSEY, CHAIRMAN OF JOINT CHIEFS

"Retreat hell! We just got here!"
CAPT. LLOYD WILLIAMS, USMC

"The safest place in Korea was right behind a platoon of MARINES. LORD, how they could fight!"
MAJ. GEN. FRANK LOWE, U.S. ARMY

"Panic sweeps my men when they are facing the AMERICAN MARINES."
CAPTURED NORTH KOREAN MAJOR

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985

"There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and those who have met them in battle. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion." Unknown

2007-03-28 14:48:30 · answer #3 · answered by SnowWebster2 5 · 1 1

I would say that the Brits are a first class operation in all areas. As far as their aircraft technology it is equal to the U.S., but on a smaller scale. For example the P51 Mustang of WW2 used a British aircraft engine (Merlin). Also, the Harrier is a British made aircraft. As far as their training we (U.S.) have shaped our military to resemble theirs. I would say that they are not stronger than the U.S. but, they would be a match against anyone attacking their home island.

2007-03-28 15:06:04 · answer #4 · answered by Emmett C 3 · 0 2

no. americas military spends more money on military training and equipment than all the other countries in the world combined. the USN's ship's tonnage together totals more than the next 17 countries navies combined. britain is kind of sneeky, but when it comes to raw power, america is on top. and you trusted comments about borat. well your going to be depending on this so i guess i shouldnt takl

2007-03-28 14:45:02 · answer #5 · answered by Jimmy C 1 · 0 2

the american armed forces are better trained and have better technology. thats just a fact.

2007-03-28 14:42:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Very similar training and equipment, but US forces are more numerous.

2007-03-28 14:53:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

American technology is better.
Training, i dont know.
1 thing i do know...
Iran is walking a thin line.
I wouldnt mess with either!

2007-03-28 14:50:37 · answer #8 · answered by oldster 5 · 0 1

I dunno, we just haven't been the same since the sixties, right? I mean, we're just ahead of MEXICO in education! What a shame.

2007-03-28 14:43:04 · answer #9 · answered by Lucifer Sam 5 · 0 2

tfe same

2007-03-28 14:40:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers