i saw this site from someons thread with comics with rather exagerated drawings and zealous christian messages. Some of them have no actual basis in truth like the evolution one which says, and i quote "scientists have even found a normal human skull 212 million years old" and that "most scientists agree lucy is an unusual chimpanzee". Excuse me but what evidence is supported in this? If your willing to bash evolution you better put up some evidence.
http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0055/0055_01.asp
2007-03-28 13:25:57 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
As far as my knowledge and i read the science daily site. No scientists have found that "normal" skull.
2007-03-28 13:26:52 · update #1
Stupid people make Baby!Jesus cry.
2007-03-28 13:29:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I've seen this same art style used in a comic (from years and years ago) I came across that a "born again" Christian, (who at the time I thought to be a friend), which was very defamatory toward monasteries and the Catholic practices in general. Needless to say I was very shocked that people who claimed to be so close to Christ would put down a brother in Christ, whether he agreed with his doctrine or not.
I think that people who are this judgmental are going to be judged by those same standards that they use against others. May God have mercy on their souls.
2007-03-28 21:32:30 · answer #2 · answered by Shinigami 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Chick tracts are inflammatory and are aimed at targeting young kids who have no knowledge of the bible, science, or the real world..(hence the comic book format) they are intended to scare these kids into believing in Jesus.. fire insurance at best.
Unfortunately, if we ban them, we violate their right to free speech. The best we can do is expose them for what they are.
2007-03-28 20:36:56 · answer #3 · answered by Kallan 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Chick tracts are hateful garbage. They call Catholics satanists and Muslims moon worshipers among other nonsensical claims. Very few people actually believe them or use them. The ones that do use a lot of them. Jack Chick probably even wrote one about why he hates himself.
2007-03-28 20:32:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Chick uses really bad sources - ones that have been proven hoaxes and crack pots.
Look at Dr. Rebecca Brown. She hooked all her patients on pain killers, diagnosed them with illnesses they never had, said she was there to heal those diseased by the devil and apparently her and her 'friend' engaged in numerous battles with so-called Witches.
Numerous Christian publications have exposed her - yet she is still used.
Don't get me started on his supposed Catholic source - his information is so off the wall and over the top it's amazing a grown man could beleive it.
2007-03-28 20:32:45 · answer #5 · answered by noncrazed 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Their evidence comes from something called Creation Science.....hehehe. Funny stuff.
2007-03-28 20:29:41 · answer #6 · answered by KS 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The chick tracts are pure garbage.
2007-03-28 20:28:31 · answer #7 · answered by SpiritRoaming 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I love Chick tracts, they amuse me. Blessed be.
2007-03-28 20:29:41 · answer #8 · answered by Ravenhawk 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Chick literature is garbage. It's one big conspiracy.
Viva La Resistancia!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-03-28 20:38:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Beyond biased; he is completely dishonest.
2007-03-28 20:31:23 · answer #10 · answered by novangelis 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋