do u think that the war in iraq is good or bad why?

Question

do u think the violince is right i think its bad

Answer 1

Oh, most definitely bad. The whole invasion of Iraq thing on a pretence of WMD ought to tell you that. Then they used the excuse about the murder of the Kurds by Saddam. We only hear one side of that story. I'm not saying he didn't do it, but what about the other side? What about the fact that when this happened The Ba'ath Party & the US administration were almost like brothers in arms (the US armed Iraq to fight against Iran lest you forget)? This so called massacre went on whilst Rumsfeld was in Baghdad shaking hands with Saddam. Why didn't the Yanks do anything then? As for what the invasion has done....you just have to watch the news to see that. It's certainly de-stabilised the Middle East more than it has ever been since the time of the crusades, and certainly Iraq has gone to hell since Saddam hasn't it, what with religous infighting. What benefit to the Yanks & Brits? None what so ever. All we see is our troops coming back in bodybags. We shouldn't have been there in the first place. The death of those soldiers is down to Bush's Phoney War. Bush has their blood on his hands.

Answer 2

The world was some how at peace b4 9/11 even thou there was few wars around the world must never actually got beyond there nation borders they where mainly ethnic clashes or cleasing,civil strifes,political riots , or whatever you may call it ., But that singular attack on the WTO l would say was a deadly wound that as got us in this mess imagine 9/11 never happend what would the world would have been like. the decision to Attack and so call occupation that we see going on now in iraq was born of Anger and revenger how would you justify some set off people just day dreaming all in the name of R*l***0n thot of using an aeroplane as a missile to creat mass casualty it funny if you think about. Could you have imagine over 20 aeroplanes hit America on that day.

l would say the would have been rigth rigtht if America had only attack the Taliban in Afganistan swept the taliban off becauase that was where all the terrorist were groomed.Then.
Lay low abit .the terrorist were individuals not a whole nation.

They were just a bunch of fanatical murderers drunk from a wicked and dangerous ideology.

The the same LOgic colud have applied to Iraq. Saddam should have just been toppled easily under an operation sldnt have lasted more that 1month.

Use its hitech Survelance Technology ,pinpoint is location and attack emmass not a night but a daylight operation but .rather than to have granted him an hiroic departure.

Now the was taken to a whole nation and its people the sole purpoes have been dilluted bygreed , greedy multinational,bad politics,profitiaring, ingnorancet,egoism ,manipulation just to mention a few.Do you know know how many online games of the sh1l happenin in iraq that we have been l would say thousand.

Stop been an occupier Brings your troops home.keeping those America lads in iraq for too long will continue to be a sour tasteon the would symphaty America would have Enjoyed world over after post 9/11.

iTs tragic

USA WASNT THE PROVOCATOR NOR THE AGGRESSOR

Answer 3

An internationally recognised state, which was stable, no matter how little its regime was liked, was invaded for reasons that were invented by the invaders.
There were, in fact, no internationally recognised "legitimate" reasons to engage in that war.
The country that was invaded has become totally destabilised.
Over 600,000 people, most of them civilians, have died as a direct result of that war.
Considerably fewer, by many tens of thousands, died under the disliked regime, over an extremely longer time period. During that regime there were good standards of health care, education and general welfare, and the overall quality of life was above average for countries in that region of the world. Those have all been destroyed.
It seems unlikely that any stable situation will be arrived at prior to the withdrawal of the invaders.
So a war was created which destabilised an entire country, killed 600,000 people, and is certain to leave chaos in its wake when the foreign troops leave.
No. On the whole I believe that this adventure might, just possibly, be a small error on the part of our ever honorable governments. They cannot, after all, be blamed for fictionalising the reasons for starting it all, continuing it, death, destruction, total destabilisation and an ignominious end that was entirely foreseeable (see my remarks to my friends in the pub right at the beginning).

Answer 4

War & violence is bad because it doesn't achieve much except bloodshed, unnecessary loss of lives, and hatred. As for the war in Iraq being about terrorists, please will people stop being naive enough to believe the propaganda. There were no terrorists, no weapons of mass destruction, no just cause.

Even the UN thought the war in Iraq was unjustified, the US just bulldozed over their decision, and the UK simply went along with it as the 51st state! All the US and UK have done now is to create a whole new generation of would-be terrorists, and given them reasons to become suicide bombers!

Look at Mahatma Ghandi - he never raised a finger or incited others to use violence, and yet he achieved his objectives in a very peaceful and non-violent way. We should all live and let live.

Answer 5

I think its pretty bad right now, too many young people are dieing and are returning with limbs blown off. I think we are losing at the moment, but I only hope that the soldiers will come home soon.

Answer 6

yea its the best thing since the car.... all these people getting killed everyday, getting shot or blown up its great.....

silly billy cause its not good, don't think we will ever have a good war...unless both sides all meet on the battle field then just say sod it lets go home...

all wars are bad....OK... people killing each other is not good..

Answer 7

Bad. The US and UK forces had no right to go in, it is an agressive war. The intelligence was faulty, the reasons given never proven.

Answer 8

All types of war is bad. People could all live in peace if they were not so Greedy

Answer 9

whether a war is good or bad depends on the out come. its still to early to tell, wars are decided by out come. I believe it started out good but the American soldier who have raped and killed civilians over there gave the US a bad reputation. they saw us as liberators until that point. I will not say what needs to be done over there but the guys that committed these crimes only got 20 years they need to be drug out into the street of Iraq and shot to show that they were not in support of what America's dream for Iraq is. even if we win the combative war we can still lose the P.R. war and that is just as terrifying thought as losing all together.

Answer 10

I'm going to give you an email site www.casadice.com/charity.htm and play the video that should give you your answer its nothing that is going to make you sick its a short film that someone made that is set to music i got it sent to me from a Marine in America if you have any tissues handy they might help