In the years since the Iraq War, I have read news reports saying that WMDs were found, that they weren't found, and everything in between. What is the truth?
2007-03-28 10:53:44 · 12 answers · asked by Zindo 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Yes they have been found. Over 500 WMD's have been found since 2003. Saddam actually used WMD's on the Kurds. There are alot of articles out there about it and some unclassified Gov. documents. Do some research, you will be surprised at what the liberal media doesn't tell you. To many people think only nukes are WMD's which is not true.
2007-03-28 11:13:52 · answer #1 · answered by RUSH MAKES OBAMA CRY !! A LOT !! 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The Bush administration deceived and lied the rustic into attacking Iraq, cynically exploiting the terrorism of 9/11 to launch a conflict long on the schedule of neocons alongside with Cheney and Wolfowitz. Bush's professional-conflict propaganda labored so properly that even right this moment greater advantageous than a million/2 of all people wrongly have self assurance that Saddam had WMDs and became in the back of 9/11.The Bush administration produced 1000's of pretend information thoughts that have been aired on television around the rustic as information, constituting what the GAO, the investigative arm of Congress, calls unlawful 'covert propaganda.'"
2016-10-01 21:14:24 · answer #2 · answered by riopel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They did find chemical WMDs in Iraq. However those were not the WMDs we went to war over. There has been many times in Iraq where Saddam started weapons programs. The most recent one that can be proven was in '98 when Clinton and other countries intervened politically to stop it. Then, it was said that he started another one in the 2000s. That is what the Bush administration sold to us as one of the reasons we went to war. No WMDs from this alleged program has ever been found.
People tend to think the WMD issue is black and white, when in fact it is very complicated.
2007-03-28 10:59:08 · answer #3 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Our satilight 3 years ago picked up 8 mobile launchers, 5 were captured 4=empty= 1 was stripped and the other 3 are missing. Then suddam's son killed 5,000 KURDS with poison gas in a week. last month poison gas was used in Iraq. my opinion is the launchers havent been found by either side yet, or their in a certain position that can't be used becaused of our troops== WEAPONS of MASS DESTRUCTION===can you imagine those missles loaded with poisonous gas fired to many nations. What was that question AGAIN?, Oh and the sleepers = our gov. wants to bring our troops HOME.= For a LARGE GRAVE YARD. Oh Iraq 2nd. largest oil produceing countries in the WORLD.
2007-03-28 11:23:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Traces of WMD were found. Which means that there were actually some there. Most suspect that the weapons were moved to Syria or Iran. I believe that Syria has them and I am disgusted that the media chooses to ignore that there was evidence found of WMD when they report. The media is making our country look bad and unstable.
2007-03-28 11:05:30 · answer #5 · answered by Paul S 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Saddam moved them all into Syria in the 2 weeks between kicking out the inspectors and the invasion.
2007-03-28 11:03:59 · answer #6 · answered by prizynstile 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Read for yourself. It's funny how these liberals swear by the liberal media until the media says something they don't want them to say.
Everyone that said they weren't found are trolls and want to lie to you just to keep you from believing the truth.
If this were just one news site, I wouldn't believe it either but as you can see there are many more than one site.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/world/meast/04/0...
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,2004...
http://www.cnn.com/2003/world/meast/04/1...
More:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3...
http://www.boston.com/news/world/article...
2007-03-28 12:21:07 · answer #7 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nothing in the quantity that would qualify as "mass destruction". So, the answer is no.
Thumbs down?
For you illiterates, the question was "were weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq"? That means weapons of mass destruction. That does not mean empty containers, delivery vehicles or conspiracy theories about Syria. What part of the question don't you understand?
2007-03-28 10:59:54 · answer #8 · answered by oncogenomics 4 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Yes! "weapons" of words were used in "mass" media decptions with very "destructive" lies.
2007-03-28 11:08:26 · answer #9 · answered by ARM 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No WMDs were found in Iraq
2007-03-28 10:57:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋