Why is the drug smuggler who put 2 Border Agents in prison RELATED TO KC SMARTPORT PRESIDENT?

Question

Coincidence? I don't think so. Lou Dobbs slammed Sutton yesterday on his special edition. Want to hear something else that is sick coming directly from the Homeland Security Chertoff's mouth? Here is an excerpt from Lou Dobbs on March 26, 2007:

TUCKER: Now, papers obtained by the conservative group Judicial Watch under the Freedom of Information Act from the Department of Homeland Security show that many of our security policies, in fact, perhaps have already been coopted. In fact, it quotes Michael Chertoff in memos internally telling the department to align itself with the priorities and the values of SPP when it comes to security- related matters regarding Canada and Mexico.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0703/26/ldt.01.html

Answer 1

As a rep, I say put Gonzalez and Sutton on the hot seat, not only for this but the sex abuse case at the Texas boys school they have been covering up. Right now I'd say Lou Dobbs would be the best choice dems could pick because I would vote for him. He knows we have been sold out to Mexico and other foreign countries, and rather than the USA serving as an example, we are copying those third world countries where an elite few hold all the wealth and the masses are overtaxed, overegulated, and ignored. Tax cuts are great, but the error has been that this money thus returned is going overseas, not back into the USA economy or industrial infrastructure or manufacturing. TR warned us that "unfettered capitalism" would achieve the same thing as Marxism, all the wealth in the hands of a few who make decisions for how the rest will live. And it gets even better, they say much of our security operations being contracted out will be run by Dubai based companies, no wonder Halliburton moved there? that said drug dealer has been arrested twice since the shooting, smuggling drugs, and let go. Forget Iran, I think we need to do something about the government in Mexico.

Answer 2

"The state of Idaho is fighting Congress and President Bush on the creation of the North American Union. Idaho is calling on its congressional representatives in Washington to step in and block the plan.

Now, as Bill Tucker reports, 13 other states are considering similar measures.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

BILL TUCKER, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice over): The fight against the North American Union is escalating. Not at the federal level, but at the state level.

Currently, 14 states are considering legislation opposing what the administration calls the Security and Prosperity Partnership. In Idaho, the measure has been approved by both houses of its legislature because Idaho is tired of the secrecy.

In a simple statement from one of the Senate sponsors, he explains, "... Idaho wants Congress to weigh in on this and get it out in the open and vote on it."

At the federal level, it's hard to escape the push for unifying Canada, Mexico and the United States. The language is everywhere, even though the people have never voted on it.

In last year's failed so-called comprehensive immigration reform bill, the Senate inserted language praising the North American Union for progress made "... in developing and implementing an immigration security strategy for North America that works towards the development of a common security perimeter." In other words, gone are the borders of the United States of America, welcome to the borders of North America.

It's a far cry from what's happening at the state level. "

I am sincerely glad to hear that, and I hope we are all doing our part to express our displeasure.

Answer 3

I fear that a revolution is close at hand in this country.

Answer 4

if she don't talk put her rear in jail. sounds like they need to fire a bunch of folks.

Answer 5

All I can say is: IT FIGURES!