For all those that thought those British sailors were in Iranian water:?

Question

What do you think of the new news that GPS proved that they were in Iraqi waters, and even Iran had stated that those coordinates were correct and are now aware that it was Iraqi waters, yet they are only sending 1 sailor back, the female?


In yo face to all those people who were like "They were in Iranian waters they should be held and tortured just like the evil US does when they go out rounding up innocents. You people always assume the enemy is right first ebfore your country and you always believe the word of the enemy overthe word of your allies.

Shows something about your character doesn't it.

@ Pishisua

"And Saddam had WMD. I think you still watch Cindrella, right?"

What rock have you been under. I can post 10 different news sources, all mainstream aknolwedging that he had WMD's. He was also found with them in 91 in Kuwait, he also used them to kill hundreds of Kurds.

What possible source could you use to claim that Sadam never had any WMD's. Even the cinderella story is more logical than yours.

Answer 1

I don't think there are many people who are dumb enough to give Iran any credibility in this situation.

Iran is begging for war.

Answer 2

Even when I thought they were in Iranian waters, I still thought the right thing to do for the British commander was to sink the Iranian ship(s), and then call in for advice after the noise died down. If they had been in Iranian waters, they were there under orders given by mistake, witting or otherwise. Responsible leadership does not allow servicemen to pay the price for a mistake of leadership, and civilized nations know this. I would have ordered that Iranian vessel sunk, period. What the hell, it was bound to be an international incident anyway, why leave civilized people as hostages of Klingons.

This was either an act of war, or at the very least an act of piracy. Failure to respond was either an act of cowardice or stupidity.

Answer 3

those are disputed waters - the bluejobs in all likelihood had orders to stay on the Iraqi aspect, yet it really is precisely the water the Iranians imagine is theirs. i visit't see why those men were frolicked to dry - truthfully after very last time, in case you understand the Iranians are going to make a level of capturing you and having a teach-trial, you received't deliver them in except they have were given this manner of back-as a lot as make a good strive against of it? i'm having a wager they were bait - that is the purely thanks to make experience of it. at the same time as the Iranians are dancing and rejoicing at humbling the Little devil, their protect's down for only lengthy sufficient for SAS/SBS to covertly enter the country and do what they ought to. that is an previous, previous, avert: their defences see what you opt for them to work out (0.5 a dozen sprog sailors up **** Creek and not using a paddle) who're very conspicuously there. Alll obtainable Iraninans steam in to make a bust. at the same time as their interest is diverted, your particular forces nip in covertly by the hollow. (i believe this has been utilized in Northern eire some cases to grant a smokescreen for particular forces crossing the border and doing what they had to do interior the Republic). a minimum of i wish it truly is what's happening - it will make the RN seem a lot less inept and ineffective... yet oh for the same incident the position the Iranians set off a reallty decisive reaction and get the $hit kicked out of them...

Answer 4

To tell you the truth, you're the first one that I've seen who suggested that the British might have been in Iranian waters.
Maybe I missed it. Nothing would surprise me. But if people can't see that Iran is trying to take advantage of this they're not using good reason. Why would they release a female prisoner and not all of them?

Answer 5

Who's saying what your asserting? I think most people are waiting for facts-- unless their wackos.

Even if they WERE in Iranian waters (which they weren't), the Iranians should have just escorted them out.

Answer 6

Typical timing -- Bush needs a crisis but can't make one for himself without being questioned. Therefore, he got the British Navy involved to send them into Iranian waters to provoke a crisis. Since the British supports the US in Iraq, it would stand to reason that Tony Blair and his British Navy could become the patsies to create an incident that would let Bush participate in another war for oil. Fishy, Fishy, Fishy --as fishy as his pandering to DuBai and the Arabs after 19 of them attacked the USA on 9/11/01. Treason should be charged for Bush and his cabinet. We shouldn't trust him and we need to limit his power before he goes completely nuts. He's too much of a loose cannon and he's totally unreasonable and too much of a tyrant and dictator. Impeach him today along with his cabinet and his attorney general who is the son of migrant workers and therefore of questionable loyalty to the USA.

Answer 7

What's with this "in yo face"?

Sure, the Brits have proved the GPS coordinates. I had a feeling it was such anyways...but if people get in your face over it, just blow it off.

No need to come back "in yo face". That doesn't prove anything.

Answer 8

I never questioned they were doing the right thing, the Brit's are very methodical and intelligent.

Answer 9

And Saddam had WMD. I think you still watch Cindrella, right?

Answer 10

It still would look a lot better for Britan if she didn't admit they were trespassing in Iranian waters...