definately m y stepdad. because is a a hiprocrate..... thats enough reason to drop a 10 tonner on his head..
2007-03-28 05:49:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Vu 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Pilgrim (above): if that is truly your belief, then I am very sorry for you. You must be a very sad individual. Also, on a practical level your "plan" is quite silly and guaranteed only to radically increase the number of enemy combatants by including Moslems who have nothing to do with the instant conflict. Why not threaten to nuke Jerusalem if the KKK doesn't stop hating people... same effect.
2007-03-28 12:59:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Blackacre 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Do I have to choose a single person or can I annihilate an entire country or region? A continent targeted for extinction, now there's an idea.
Sorry, Mexico, but I just solved the Illegal immigrant problem. We nuke Mexico into the sea and then the border hoppers from Central and South America will have to swim or die trying like the Cubans and Haitians.
2007-03-28 12:53:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Several bombs, first filled the the blood and guts of PIGS in the Middle East. Then when they pissed off even more when that happened, then the big one, make the area a glass palace. That what the radical rag heads deserve
2007-03-28 13:11:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
On Mecca.
If I were POTUS, I'd disband the CIA, Dept. of Homeland Security and all other non-constitutional alphabet soup federal agencies, then issue the pronouncement that subsequent terrorist attacks will result in the destruction of Mecca.
After Mecca was destroyed, each terror attack would result in the bombing of a radical mosque (when full of radical islamofascists).
Then, issue an executive order declaring any killing of muslims an act of self-defense (since they're required by the Koran to kill any who will not convert to islam).
It's that easy. The war would be over, the enemy would continue to be systematicall destroyed, and peace would ensue rapidly.
.
2007-03-28 12:55:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by s2scrm 5
·
3⤊
3⤋
Ama dim a jerk,of Iran.
A 5000 Gal. bladder of HOGS Blood,laser guided from 50,000 ft.
2007-03-28 12:58:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would probably just deactivate the bomb. Hopefully.
2007-03-28 13:41:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't, there is always collateral damage and casualties.
Should I feel so eaten up with hatred then I would prefer to see the person blink before I shot him.
2007-03-28 12:51:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by rogerglyn 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I would need many bombs, because I would drop tons of them on every munitions factory on earth.
No more bombs.
2007-03-28 13:05:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tokoloshimani 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction...
2007-03-28 13:06:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by ShadowCat 6
·
1⤊
0⤋