does any one beleave that 911 was truely planned by our own president and government?

Question

well i do, i beleave that our president is playing a game of risk with our world because he wonts nothing but domination over Africa and the U.S.A.

Answer 1

Any solid evidence? Or are you going to depend on infowars as your number one source.

Answer 2

While I am not so sure that DUBYA, our ignorant and not-so-illustrious president, had a hand in 9/11 per se, there is enough questionable evidence to bring up a reasonable doubt about what really happened.

To my mind, the thing that is most suspicious is the way the Twin Towers fell. Having viewed many controlled implosions on various TV programs, I was personally amazed at how much the falling of the Twin Towers resembled a controlled implosion. While there may be many out-to-lunch conspiracy theory believers out there with numerous axes to grind, and the ability to see all manner of spooks under their beds, that doesn't necessarily mean that all who believe that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job, or were assisted by insiders are wrong, insane, or conspiracy theory nut cases! As the old adage says, "Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get me!"

Not before or since 9/11 has a fire-engulfed skyscraper fallen, up to and including the Empire State Building. It still stands even after being hit by an Army bomber in the thirties. That accident killed a few people, and caused some fairly extensive damage. It didn't; however, bring the building down, nor did it damage the superstructure to the point that it was unusable. It still stands to this day, and is in daily use as well. How can it be that a building that effectively had the same kind of "accident" happen stands to this day while a building that was built to modern standards and newer materials failed? Also, when you consider the building in Manhattan that was hit by a plane earlier this year still stands, there is enough reasonable doubt about the "truth" of 9/11 that we have been sold.

To my mind, there is no way to explain this glaring inconsistency. There may be numerous other theories behind, and paranoid delusions about the cause of 9/11, all of which can be easily and completely disproved. The fact that the Twin Towers fell as if they had been purposely imploded remains the fly in the ointment of those who say the attack was ONLY the product of lunatic Islamic fundamentalist terrorists.

I think that perhaps a more reasonable question would be who knew what was going to happen, and when. I simply cannot believe that our intelligence agencies were completely in the dark about the coming of 9/11.

Considering the August memo, ignored by both DUBYA and Condi Rice, entitled "Bin Laden Determined To Strike In America", someone somewhere knew there was a foul stench on the breeze coming from the Middle East. Considering what an event such as 9/11 could do politically for an otherwise lame (and lame duck) president, there exists a hint of believability that there was a benefit to be gained by turning the other way as three thousand Americans were killed.

DUBYA's actions and inaction in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina prove him to be completely and callously insensitive to the deaths of "expendable" Americans. What makes anyone think he'd care about the deaths of those killed in the 9/11 attacks except for the political advantage he'd gain from invoking their names when it suits his needs?

Of course, beyond even this, there remains the question of why we didn't attack Saudi Arabia (over half the "terrorists" were Saudis)?

Oh yeah, that's right, their monetary infusion into our economy keeps the country from going bankrupt. Yeah, we don't collude with countries that harbor terrorists unless their money provides ten percent of the capital in our economy. We could never attack them...oh no!

Beyond that, when there was absolutely NO connection between 9/11 and Iraq, why did we start a war of choice with the only stable country in the region?

Oh yeah, Saddam made DUBYA's daddy look like a total fool and wimp. We can't have that, now can we?

9/11, while an unbelievable American tragedy, has also been used as an excuse for the (Un)Patriot(ic) Act, the Military Commissions Act (legalized torture), and other laws that have relieved us of our civil rights. Perhaps it was just perpetrated by lunatic terrorists with bad attitudes. However, if the only evidence that there was collusion from within the US is the way the buildings fell, then that's enough evidence to cast a black pall of suspicion over the entire affair.

Also, to those who seem to think that belittling others for sharing their opinion makes them superior, just remember, not everyone who sees conspiracies is a nut case. All that is required for a conspiracy to exist is two or more people agreeing to do take part in an event. Once again, "Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get me!"

Blessed be!
Pappy

Answer 3

Whoever wrote this "well i do, i beleave that our president is playing a game of risk with our world because he wonts nothing but domination over Africa and the U.S.A"

Not only can you not spell, but you are retarded if you truly believe that. I can't believe you and I live in the same country, you are disgusting. To think, the highest elected official in our country would engage to kill over 3000 people and destroy and upset such a huge financial center as the World Trade Center is unbelievable and you are completely stupid if you give any credence to this idea.

Answer 4

I guess that it would depend on what you classify as planned. If ignoring signs of impending disaster is considered planning, then yes, but I don't think so. It is not possible to believe that a certain thing will happen, when there is no precedent for it. For example...never before has there been such a large undertaking at the same time. All previous bombings, or terrorist activities were done as individual issues. Never before were there 4 or 5 planned to be commited at the same time. So, if a person was to ignore that possibility, would that be planned? Also, never before, was a plane crashed into a building on purpose. Planes were hijacked, but the people doing the hijacking did so to either kill passengers of a certain religious belief, or a certain nationality, or to use to escape to a different country. Never before did a hijacker use a plane as a weapon, so to think that it could happen and ignoring it, isn't too much of a stretch. So, unless your playing like a Monday morning quarterback, saying that you would have done this or that only after the facts are revealed isn't too intelligent. Now, knowing what "new" thing will happen and preventing it, now that would be something. So, what are you prepared to prevent in the future that you can't see in the present? Probably nothing, since you have no idea of what might happen in the future.

Answer 5

I have believed that very early on after the "attacks." The moment that the Bush administration decided to throw huge amounts of money at the victims' families only after having them signing releases stating that they would never pursue any legal action against the government or the airlines, I became skeptical about something I could not put my finger on at the time. If you are curious about the truth movement or just want to do research for yourself, the following link is the absolute best there is for any doubts or questions you may have, http://911scholars.org/ Here you will find the most comprehensive collection of information ever compiled by Professor Steven E. Jones, PhD of Brigham Young University; Dr. James Fetzer, Founder for Scholars for 911 Truth and many others.

Answer 6

I just sat and read all of to answers to that query. One man is not for responsible for 911.Or one Government. We as a people would not have allowed An invasion onto foreign soil,
without An act to stir up our emotions. We blindly followed one Mans rhetoric. Fueled by the Media.Pictures say a thousand words.But its the words that are used that determines the out come. Powers at be knew that a foot hold was needed in the Middle east. However We are now Leary since we are learning of the high price we are paying to achieve this.Is the blood of our sons @ daughters worth that price. Yes,. If you like your freedom. For one moment wake up. The U.S. consist of 6% of the world population. We are no longer the Super power we once were.Economically or militarily. Our allies would not allow us to dominate.But look at it this way if European powers could see a way to strengthen there own countries, Lets sacrifice the U.S.
we never did like them to begin with.Read world news our Allies are leaving us in droves.

Answer 7

I believe that there is no logical explaination on how planes can be used to crash into our stuff. We are not that incompetent as a country that those things could not have been avoided. The answers you seek are at this website just copy and paste. http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html#bombs

All of your doubts will be cleared up. Read all of the material it is all fact and it was aired the same day of the attacks. There is a cover up. Just like Pat Tillman the football turned Army Ranger who was killed in action but our government said it was an ambush even though he was gunned down by fellow Rangers.

Answer 8

Yes people believe that.

There are questions surrounding the events of 9/11, but putting the blame immediately upon the president or top government officials only shows how shallow many people's research is and how demonizing public officials leads to early conclusions.

Find out the true facts about 9/11, THEN try to determine who was behind it.

Answer 9

Explain how that many people could be in on such a production and noone is coming forward. We all saw the tapes of the Muslims going through security gates that morning. These people are all anti Bush and would love to blame anything on him. Why would America sacrifice that many innocent people, destroy two huge buildings, and cause the airline industry that much money. Remember, republicans are Capitalists, why would they destroy the economy like that? Bush doesn't want to dominate the world either. Noone ever mentions the sicko dictators in the world! Isn't it great that our government establishes term limits for our leader. That way we don't end up like Cuba, Venezuala, Iraq (under Sadam), N. Korea, etc.....

Answer 10

That's an interesting opinion. I just saw a film you might want to examine, it's called "Loose Change 911"
as it happened, I also saw another film titled "The Disclosure Project", which, if these films are deemed factual, in part or whole, demonstrate that hunger, poverty, and suffering are all put upon the world by the few who are in control. And they collect our money in exchange for their efforts.

Interesting ... keep learning, friend. I have made it a hobby to examine a broad spectrum of opinions - that's what makes America great, and one of our last freedoms.

Enjoy!

Answer 11

There will always be conspiracy theorists. If the president truly wanted domination in Africa, don't you think the first step would be to send troops there? If you truly think the US wanted to conquer anybody, wouldn't it be easier just to drop a bomb on them? It only took 2 to conquer Japan, then we turned around and gave their country back to them. All we want is for other countries to not come here.