It was a travesty on both sides. Those cult leaders who lead people astray face the judgment of God. Our government blew it, funny, when we react late to saving New Orleans when people were told to leave because disaster is immanent, that is front page news for weeks. When this happened, it went away pretty quickly, I wonder why?
2007-03-28 15:32:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yep, Waco was a travesty. In the end the people running the ATF made the moves because they were getting pressure from the justice department. Janet Reno acknoledged that after the investigation. The people in the davidian cult, mislead as they were, didn't deserve to be forced into a situation where they were burned to death.
2007-03-28 09:46:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by ɹɐǝɟsuɐs Blessed Cheese Maker 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
good question
i agree completely
nice to see atheists and christians getting along
those poor men women and children died a horrible death
their bodies were twisted by gas like pretzels
i think they kept the press back for miles
and as usual
they got rid of all the evidence
right away by bulldozing it
our government is like a big bully
thats why they did what they did
i dont know why they are so threatened by someone
who is the leader of a cult
maybe they are control freaks
and what was the connection to the oklahoma city bombing
it happened on the same day
and i dont remember much explanation
other than assuming it was a retaliation
i think theres a movie about it
called rules of engagement
also alex jones helped rebuild the church there
next time im in waco i plan to visit
2007-03-28 09:51:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
The government was wrong and failed at Waco. I totally agree with you on this one. I was shocked and disgusted by the findings on this incident. But then I remembered it was our government, and I realized I shouldn't be so shocked afterall.
I do not support Koresh by any means, but what happened there made me ashamed to be an american that day.
2007-03-28 09:45:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by glitterkittyy 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I place the Waco incident along the lines of sending the Japanese to concentration camps on World War 2.
It showed me that our government can get support for Hitleresque activity, and lie about it with so called expert's opinion.
It was a shame that our govenment has allowed time and corruption to cover up.
2007-03-28 10:01:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Christian Sinner 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Ruby Ridge set the precedent.
2007-03-28 09:43:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Margo H 1
·
3⤊
0⤋
If your govt can lie to you about invading Iraq and cause thousands of your servicemen to die, the waco incident is just the tip of the iceberg.
2007-03-28 09:47:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by halo 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Yes, and people lost their lives
for a false prophet Its what Jim Jones
made his people believe would happen
to them... Who knows it may have
2007-03-28 09:51:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by manoman 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'm glad you asked this question,,,And I'm happy to see that
there are people here that think for themselves,,.and draw
their own conclusions!!!
Be careful big brother IS watching,,
2007-03-28 09:57:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Individual freedom is the dream of our age. It's what our leaders promise to give us, it defines how we think of ourselves and, repeatedly, we have gone to war to impose freedom around the world. But if you step back and look at what freedom actually means for us today, it's a strange and limited kind of freedom.
Politicians promised to liberate us from the old dead hand of bureaucracy, but they have created an evermore controlling system of social management, driven by targets and numbers. Governments committed to freedom of choice have presided over a rise in inequality and a dramatic collapse in social mobility. And abroad, in Iraq and Afghanistan, the attempt to enforce freedom has led to bloody mayhem and the rise of an authoritarian anti-democratic Islamism. This, in turn, has helped inspire terrorist attacks in Britain. In response, the Government has dismantled long-standing laws designed to protect our freedom.
The origins of our contemporary, narrow idea of freedom.
shows how a simplistic model of human beings as self-seeking, almost robotic, creatures led to today's idea of freedom. This model was derived from ideas and techniques developed by nuclear strategists during the Cold War to control the behaviour of the Soviet enemy.
Mathematicians such as John Nash developed paranoid game theories whose equations required people to be seen as selfish and isolated creatures, constantly monitoring each other suspiciously – always intent on their own advantage.
This model was then developed by genetic biologists, anthropologists, radical psychiatrists and free market economists, and has come to dominate both political thinking since the Seventies and the way people think about themselves as human beings.
However, within this simplistic idea lay the seeds of new forms of control. And what people have forgotten is that there are other ideas of freedom. We are, in a trap of our own making that controls us, deprives us of meaning and causes death and chaos abroad.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctwo/noise/?id=trap
2007-03-28 09:46:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋