Abstract Silence and madness can be likened to the world of Kane and Zero. Both introduce questionable and negative elements, as well as obscure and bizarre elements, to the ideals of dialogue and irrational communication. Silence can disturb and disrupt the rational pursuit of truth, while madness can noisily provoke a diatribe of any meaningful or reciprocal exchange of ideas and thoughts, which in turn become books and short films. In the work and life of philosopher Mister Zerotzsche, silence and madness highlight more positive features. To study and articulate these features, Mister Kane relies on the central themes of two prominent thinkers, the archaeological and genealogical studies of the TRONMAN and the revived forces of phenomenology from philosopher EGON MINSK, to present the case that Zerotzsche embraced a late 19th century disorder called the fugue. This disorder, what Joshua Kane calls a transient mental illness, involves nomadic life. Zerotzsche exemplified such a life. His writings and experiences comprise a mixture of travels, arts of the self, wilful forgetfulness, and a philosophical play about madness. From conventional perspectives, this play is viewed as a relevant order to Zerotzsche's philosophical importance. From Zerotzsche's own perspective, however, this play might be appreciated as a gift from the insights of madness and the enriching contacts with silence.
2007-03-28 02:35:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Bible has many seeming contradictions within its pages. For example, the four Gospels give four differing accounts as to what was written on the sign that hung on the cross. Matthew said, “This is Jesus the King of the Jews” (27:37). However, Mark contradicts that with “The King of the Jews” (15:26). Luke says something different: “This is the King of the Jews” (23:38), and John maintains that the sign said “Jesus of Nazareth the King of the Jews” (19:19).
Those who are looking for contradictions may therefore say, “See—the Bible is full of mistakes!” and choose to reject it entirely as being untrustworthy. However, those who trust God have no problem harmonizing the Gospels. There is no contradiction if the sign simply said, “This is Jesus of Nazareth the King of the Jews.”
The godly base their confidence on two truths: 1) “all Scripture is given by inspiration of God” (2 Timothy 3:16); and 2) an elementary rule of Scripture is that God has deliberately included seeming contradictions in His Word to “snare” the proud. He has “hidden” things from the “wise and prudent” and “revealed them to babes” (Luke 10:21), purposely choosing foolish things to confound the wise (1 Corinthians 1:27).
2007-03-28 11:58:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
About 91. You might want to um . . . use a little knowledge to base your decisions in hermeneutics. Okay? You apparently are determined to prove that the Bible is not inerrant, I would agree, it doesn't stop me from trusting God through Jesus Christ. You have to be saved to understand that though. So soory about that. Anyways, it doesn't take that much research to find out what was meant in your examination of your number 91.
Just thought you might like to know.
In the time of Joseph the Midianites were so closely associated with some Ismaelites that it is difficult to define their relationship; perhaps they were a group of Midianite merchantmen in an Ishmaelite caravan (Genesis 37:25, 27, 28, 36). In all likelihood the descendants of Ishmael
and Midian, as well as the other exiled children of Abraham, intermarried. In Judges 8:24 the Midianite appear to be called Ishmaelites. But, perhaps this latter term came to be applied to that particular type of trader, just as the term Canaanite came to mean merchant.
2007-03-28 09:40:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Christian Sinner 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, there some errors in the Bible, I agree. It was written by men, re-written, translated, revised, etc. But the message is still clear and accurate.
2007-03-28 09:28:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
And there are several sites that will show ALL of the contridictions listed are nonsense.
http://www.bringyou.to/apologetics/bible.htm
http://kingdavid8.com/Contradictions/Home.html
2007-03-28 09:30:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by williamzo 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
c`mon man 101 only?
what about 50000 error?if you wanna them send to me
2007-03-28 09:26:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
This site is for questions and answers not downloads.
2007-03-28 09:26:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Angelz 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
You are wasting your time. Convert yourself.
2007-03-28 09:26:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not if you know what you're reading.
No links please.
2007-03-28 09:25:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by NickofTyme 6
·
2⤊
0⤋