Or is it another way to give Satan and his so called Secret Society more power to set up the Great seven year Tribulation against Christians.
2007-03-27 23:52:01 · 8 answers · asked by chucky 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
We can't attack on your watch. Always listen to the voices in your head.
Paranoia = Total Awareness
2007-03-27 23:55:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
666 may refer to:
AD 666, the year
666 (number), the number
The Number of the Beast, a reference in the book of Revelation in the New Testament
666 Desdemona, a minor planet in the asteroid belt.
U.S. Route 491, an American highway formerly called route 666
A brand of cough syrup and other OTC preparations made by the Monticello Drug Company
The 1980 Pennsylvania Lottery Scandal, known as "The Triple Six Fix"
666 Satan, a Japanese comic
666 is the octal representation of the number four hundred and thirty eight, and is often used in setting file system permissions on Unix-like operating systems
2007-03-28 07:22:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What you're thinking is purely speculative. If you try to piece events together you'll always find what you want to find.
True, things are coming together for the end times, but to be able to point at something and call it with accuracy is a difficult if not impossible thing to do. You know the signs mentioned by Christ, right? Just look for those.
Please don't be offended, but shouldn't we all be more interested in the return of Christ, rather than the appearance of Satan?
2007-03-28 07:06:41 · answer #3 · answered by Jed 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I dont know about that, its just more bloated government. Thank you Bush. I really needed that color coded alert system that hasnt been right yet. Oh yeah, it scares them away, great plan, throw another 500 billion into the homeland security budget.
2007-03-28 06:59:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It seems reasonable to me to protect the safety of people by reasonable measures...
.. could personal identification systems be used for wrong devices of mischievous men... probably... but what's new about that?
bottom line... no one is more secure than he who trusts in God alone
2007-03-28 07:00:24 · answer #5 · answered by whirlingmerc 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
people who sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither
2007-03-28 07:25:59 · answer #6 · answered by BANANA 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Er, is there a third choice?
2007-03-28 06:56:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you must be kidding?
2007-03-28 06:55:54 · answer #8 · answered by Invisible_Flags 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋