Yes or No! Is global warming real?

Question

and is the U.S. to blame?

Answer 1

Yes.

Nature recycles CO2 with the "carbon cycle". But it's a delicate balance. We're messing up the balance by digging up carbon the natural cycle buried thousands of years and burning it real fast.

The data here shows it clearly. The tiny teeth are the natural cycle, with plants absorbing it during summer, and a variety of natural sources increasing it in winter. The big curve up is us, burning fossil fuels.

http://scrippsco2.ucsd.edu/graphics_gall...

The data also shows clearly it isn't the sun. Solar increase is 0.12 watts per meter squared, man's warming is 1.6 watts per meter squared, more than ten times as much. Page 4 of this report.

http://www.ipcc.ch/spm2feb07.pdf...

You can't rely on logical arguments to understand global warming. You need to actually look at numerical data. Climate scientists do that, and the vast majority of them believe global warming is real. Data about that is here:

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/fu...

Science is all about the data, not about who can argue words best.

The US is the biggest emitter of man made CO2 in the world. China is fast approaching us.

And other than the US and China, countries are starting to do something about CO2. We're not entirely to blame, but we're a major part of the problem.

Answer 2

Every day huge amounts of CO2 are exchanged, mostly by marine algae. Humans contribute a small amount enough to raise the tidal level from 300ppm to 400ppm after 140 years. It could go as high as 500ppm. The amount that is moved every day is at least 10 TIMES THIS.
The US did not start the industrial revolution.
All this depends on a causal link that is suspect at best.
Certainly there has been some warming over the last 150 years but there are other explainations. Either way it seems fair to say that there has been some Global warming.
A small amount may have to do with human activities.
Climatologists may attribute some blame for Climate Change to human activities but not CO2 by it self.
MOST IMPORTANTLY THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT TEMPERATURES HAVE RISEN SINCE 1985 SO THERE IS NO GOOD REASON TO EXPECT FURTHER INCREASES.

Answer 3

Is the planet heating up, yes. There is scientific evidence that shows that the earth heats up and cools off depending upon the cycles of orbit around the sun, and solar flare activity, this is why the Polar Ice caps on Mars are melting. As for CO2 in the atmosphere, if you look at the geological record, for most of the past 800 Million years, the earth has had MUCH more CO2 than it has today, CO2 levels rise and fall over about a 100 Million year cycle. Keep in mind though that we're actually in what's called an "InterGlacial" cycle at the moment, so we have a slight reprieve from the 100 feet thick sheet of ice that used to cover most of north America, if things get back to "Normal" this ice sheet will begin descending upon us again within about another 5000 years or so, but who knows maybe we're artificially "warming" the planet enough to where this natural cycle will be delayed, or even eliminated.

Answer 4

Yes, the planet has been generally warming for the last 150 years. How much of this is natural climate change, caused by increased population levels or man made greenhouse gas emissions no one can say for certain. Thirty years ago they were predicting another ice age. In today's culture however to question Global Warming or man's responsibility to try and stop it before we all float away, is to be subject to attack. Any movement that attacks viciously anyone with a different point of view and preaches opinions and theories as undisputable facts is one to avoid getting caught up in.

Answer 5

Yes, the globe is definitely warming, but the US can't claim it for itself - we all have some input. Whether our input is THE cause or not is irrelevant. Regardless of how much we contribute to it, it's happening, and we'd better get used to unpredictable weather, rising sea levels, VERY rough weather, and failure of all sorts of communication, electronic and personal, insurance will also become a thing of the past, food supplies will become erratic due to crop failure (for everything from wheat to tomatoes), and we may even have to develop (rather quickly, as it happens) new food plant types. That might sound like doomsaying, but the evidence is being proven every day, and now all the scientists are saying the same things.

So what do we do?
Start looking after our own resources. I don't mean survivalism, that's a sure way to oblivion, but small communities can adapt to their local changes as they happen, without relying on The Government to do something. They're not now, and they won't. They're just politicians, not problem solving working people.

Answer 6

NO!! It is not real! How do we as a species know that it is really caused by us? We have not been on this planet long enough, nor have we been studying the weather for far long enough, to know without doubt that these changes in weather are caused by us and what we are doing!!! The Earth has been around for millions of years, and how many volcanoes etc have spewed forth their toxic mixes into the atmosphere and yet the planet still survives!!! Mother Earth has put more poisons into the air than Man has in his small time on this marble!! We should just stop this silly worrying about something that we did not cause and let Nature take its course!!! How vain we must be as a species to think we could actually affect the weather in such a short time frame!

Answer 7

Okay, pleased you requested. When you move to Hawaii you consistently tan, even though you are no longer well at getting a tan, you're going to get anything of a tan. Now how does this relate? Frequency! The perspective of the solar implies that it has much less surroundings to go via whilst you're in the direction of the equator. When sun endeavor is both at it is top, or it is low, it does not always imply that needs to be relative to earth's traditional temp. Why? Well it is style of like hanging a chord. If the solar's sun endeavor isn't at a distinct variety, the reflective elements that come into play from the skin to the whole lot within the surroundings do not consistently imply roughly warmth from even a vast broaden or slash in sun endeavor. Now that is simply the begin. Next you might have neutrino (and who is aware of what else) particle emission from the solar itself, straight influencing the amplitude (waveform form) of the 22hz magnetic wave that comes from earth's 'quicker' spinning middle. Depending on sunspots extra certainly, this may occasionally disturb the magnetic area of the earth. Whenever this occurs, water beads quite special. Surface anxiety on water beads within the surroundings can impose larger or lesser traditional humidity stages. Earth's middle has been slowing down for 12,900 years, so we all know this beading final result is smaller now, we actually have extra steam within the surroundings in a few climates and altitudes, and no more in others. Nobody has but performed a complete research in this, for my part I feel they must have earlier than trying out our surroundings for carbon with a satellite tv for pc. No, earlier than I will suppose some thing approximately worldwide warming, I feel the scientists quite ought to brainstorm on the entire elements. The predominant one? that might must be middle pace. This middle we've slows down each and every 12,900 years and we are correct on the finish of the cycle. Massive geological proof proves this. The simplest cycle that fits it is dashing up once more needs to be passing via galactic axis. This is whilst the middle have got to accelerate once more, inflicting the inevitable 120degree axis shift giving us a brand new equator, and forming new ice caps.

Answer 8

no, of course global warming is not real, and yes the us is to blame for it. i blame the us for everything, we are the only people in the world that matter so we have to be the ones causing the catastrophic collapse of the only planet we have to live on

Answer 9

Yes, earth has to warm to recover from an ice age. No, the US, nor mankind in general, is not primarily responsible for global warming.

Answer 10

Yes it is. The US does hold some responsibility, but so do many other countries, particularly China and India. We, in the United States, need to speak out and put pressure on our government to change things. We can't do much about other countries, but we can about our own.