English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

Ever wondered why Creationists attack most fields of science? Because there is not one scrap of scientific evidence supporting creationism, infact science is doing the opposite its refuting their claims.

* Astronomy, Geology, Biology are some of the scientific fields that threaten creationism; they show the earth and universe is much older or life formed differently than the creationists agree on. Though whenever Creationists attack biological evolution they throw in arguments dealing with Astronomy and Geology (big bang, radiometric dating).

2007-03-27 21:34:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

If you can look at the way in which we are so wonderfully made, and then look around at the perfect (except what man has done to destroy it) environment that we live in...perfect in the way of being able to see the beauty, to feel the warmth of the sun on your skin, to smell the fragrant flowers, to laugh at the antics of animals, or our children, to feel love for our fellow man, to listen to the beautiful music that man can compose and play...well I could go on forever! But if you can appreciate any of that, then how in the world can you not see that all of this was created by a very loving Creator! Yes, man has certainly messed things up, but God has a plan to right that also. I live, that is the proof!

2007-03-28 07:47:19 · answer #2 · answered by wannaknow 5 · 0 1

YES!!!!!! Even if the creationists could really disprove evolution, it wouldn't really help their cause because it wouldn't prove creationism right, it would just prove evolution wrong. So i think creationists need to try something new like this, for their own sake, and also for the sake of the RATIONAL people out there.

2007-03-28 00:47:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

That's ironic since evolution is a story all about debunking creationism.

Which form of theory of evolution are you talking about since there are so many can you nail it down please?

I laugh every time I see some serious paleontologists look into a camera a say "this is 600 million years old" since like everyone in science knows that there is no accurate dating past 12000 years.

2007-03-27 22:19:07 · answer #4 · answered by Who's got my back? 5 · 0 3

An attacked person usually goes on defense before going on offense. People once believed in God. That came under attack by naturalists who tried to debunk Christianity. But you are right, we should provide evidences for creationism, and we do. There are dozens of ministries led by scientists now that do just that. If you look, you will find them.

2007-03-27 21:14:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

''Debunking'' actually means to disprove -- which is exactly what we've done with evolution.The word ''proofing'' does not exist--it's actually called ''proving.''And yes,we have proved creationism.Before you dismiss it,you should investigate it.Though, with your quality of spelling(proofing?),and incorrect use of words(debunking?so you DO believe we've disproved evolution?),I would strongly recommend you stay away from that which is too intellectually challenging for your mind to comprehend.
First learn to spell.
If I were an evolutionist, I would'nt be proud to have the intelligence of an ape-man(though it kinda proves a point about you guys.)

2007-03-27 22:04:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Well, there's just one problem with that.

They can't prove a thing. :-) Creationism is not science.

But it's a lovely thought, if only they would take reason to heart.

2007-03-27 21:10:11 · answer #7 · answered by Dalarus 7 · 4 1

They tried, they failed.

Have you noticed how they base all their arguments on the bible, like its absolute law. As if anything in the bible could be wrong!!!

Oh no, someone told me to think for myself. Thats OK, ill just quote the bible to them and they'll back right away.

by the way biblehelp, they're called transitional forms and there are heaps of them.

2007-03-27 21:51:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Most likely response from them:

" Scientific Proof? What is this proof you speak of?"

2007-03-27 21:11:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

Prove your evolution, show me a fossil of a reptile thats front appendages are not legs nor are they fully developed wings yet either. Or something similar that is not fully developed. Proof of creation is God's word, proof of God's word is fulfilment of prophesy, proof of prophesy is happening now. You just can't see it, because you won't exercise faith in God, so he won't let you see it as I can see it. Thumbs down mean nothing to a man of God except your ignorance of God.

2007-03-27 21:37:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 6

fedest.com, questions and answers