On here, I see so many valid questions about piercings that are caught up in the tattoo category. Does yahoo need a subdivision for piercings to make sorting them out easier if you aren't interested in sorting through all of them to find one about the other? Just wondering, I think it might be an interesting change.
2007-03-27 18:22:03 · 16 answers · asked by ~Les~ 6 in Beauty & Style ➔ Skin & Body ➔ Tattoos
I know they are related and if a division isn't added it isn't the end of the world, just a thought on observation.
2007-03-27 18:30:35 · update #1
yes i can see where that would be necessary but piercings and tatoos are also related with each other so if we don't get a subdivision it won't make a difference if we do ya us!
2007-03-27 18:27:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Good idea because it might help if there were 2 categories to organize, that way people don't have to search through the tattoo section to find a question about piercings
2007-03-27 18:26:16 · answer #2 · answered by Beauty Junkie ♥ 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No I like them together I love piercings and I love tattoos i have both so this is easier on me, but I think they need to break off a tattoo haters category for all theese haters :)
2007-03-28 04:41:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The piercing questions usually end up here and the Accessories section. I wish they'd just make a blanket category for body modification so it could include piercings, tats, implantations, scarification, etc.
2007-03-28 03:19:10 · answer #4 · answered by hotdoggiegirl 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Good question....I think though that since most tattoo studios also do piercings they are going to look at it as a body modification period. Although it would not hurt to have it it's own category.
2007-03-28 02:22:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i wish they would have a section for piercings.. but tattoos goes into the same category wiht piercings as a body modification.
i dont mind though! im sure alot of people dont =] but i do think that they need a seperate category
2007-03-27 19:12:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it particularly is a robust theory, yet so is the assumption of human beings posting inquiries to the outstanding type. i think of that if it have been divided you will possibly nonetheless get a ton of questions like, "Why is my goldfish unhappy in a bowl the dimensions of a ingesting glass?" in the two sparkling and saltwater. the suitable answer is to %. by way of and attempt to locate the questions that do no longer make you unfastened faith in all human beings!
2016-10-20 02:51:24 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i know, i don't know barely anything about tattoos because i have none but i do with piercings and it's tiring going through all these pages.
2007-03-28 11:05:28 · answer #8 · answered by nαrcíssα [misses being a TC] 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's someones job out there to "catergorize". And i'm sure they get paid well, so yes, they should get to work!
2007-03-28 03:17:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i dont think so. there is always a general category. it is difficult to manageso many things. each category requires management
2007-03-27 19:58:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋