English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Well lets see. I think there is a huge difference between sellin dope to people that want to use it to get high, and forcing a person to engage in sexual acts against their will. And child rapist should be executed on site, no questions. There is no rehab for sick individuals like that. I think drugs should all be legal. It is obvious people are gonna do them regardless of the consequences, or lasting effects drugs can sometimes have. Wanna flush your life down the shitter, go ahead, here's all the dope you can do. Wanna get raped? I am sure you would not. If you do, well then you should shoot yourself now. You are sick and there is no help for you.

2007-03-27 13:31:50 · answer #1 · answered by D 1 · 1 0

because is not easy to catch a drug dealer, but a sex offender is very easy because when we ' re talking about sex offender there's all kind of sex offender. for example there's a law that said you cannot have sex with a underages girls or boys alots of people got ,coutch, that way ,because sometimes you meet girls that look like 20 to 30 years girls do you think those girls going to tell you that they are 16 years old. ofcourse not you gonna find out in a hard way, and the law gonna take such of great pleasure to put you away. just because you made a mistake you unware of what you was doing. don't get me wrong ok, because i know there's alot of bad guys that being rapping females, and some females that knows that the boy is young but they 're do it anyway i don't care about them. that law about that 16 year old i think it's should change.

2007-03-27 20:37:11 · answer #2 · answered by marcel m 2 · 0 0

when you say sex offender please clarify....one of the problems with classifying every sex offence in a sex offender category is that there is a HUGE difference in the kinds of acts commited. For example an 18 yr old sleeping with his 16 yr olf girlfriend is a sex offence in some states, as is a child rapist. The problem is that they are lumped in the same category. Thats like saying, if I ***** slap you and if John slashes your throat its the same thing.
Should serial rapists be dealt in a tough manner and be removed from the population? absolutely!!!! However a teen making out with his boyfriend or girlfriend poses no threat

2007-03-27 20:50:31 · answer #3 · answered by rp1234562002 1 · 0 0

That is the very question i ask my lawer when i was sentenced to 3-9 yrs in state prison for possession of a 1/2 oz of cocaine.I read in the paper,people sodomize and forcibly touch young kids and get a 6-5 split.(6 months in county jail,5yrs probation).As far as I'm concerned,all the pigs in NYS are corrupt and will say anything to a grand jury to get a conviction,whether its the truth or not.Remember,you are NOT innocent until proven guilty,you ARE guilty until you prove other wise.

2007-03-27 21:37:52 · answer #4 · answered by Droptine s 4 · 1 0

I think most will agree that there is more respect for junkies than pedophiles.

2007-03-27 22:04:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers