English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This question is in relation with payment protection of a loan.

2007-03-27 12:39:14 · 8 answers · asked by branimirboychev 1 in Business & Finance Credit

8 answers

It will be for Unemployment Insurance but you'll need to read the terms of your loan contract and the payment protection clause. It's going to depend on how they worded it.

2007-03-27 12:54:09 · answer #1 · answered by Faye H 6 · 2 0

Sounds more like Redundancy to me. If you have to move to be able to do the job then you have been made redundant. If you could still commute a reasonable distance it would be wilful unemployment.

Have they offered you a Relocation Package? if they have then you would have grounds to apply for a Redundancy Payment, this would usually be at least 2 weeks pay for every year that you worked there.

Check the front of the phonebook to find information on who to talk with to find outwhat your legal entitlements are. If you signed an employment contract bring it with you.

I'm in a similar situation where they want to change my Terms of Employment and want me to sign a new contract. I refused and threatened to go to the Labour Court but I'm the only one out of 40 people who did so. I wish you luck!

2007-03-27 20:16:46 · answer #2 · answered by Joe 2 · 0 0

it's is willfull unemployment
you do not state where ( how far ) the redeployment
but in any case insurance policies on loan genrally do not cover people who refue to work ( as a genral rule of thumb ) and since you refused readily avalible work, that is willfull unemployment

2007-03-27 21:01:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It all depends on the circumstances. If your employer requested you now work than 9 miles away from your permanant abode, it is classed as unreasonable and your well within your rights to take legal action. (and i think you would easily win a constructive dismissal case.) Under 9 miles and your **** outa luck mucker!

2007-03-27 20:43:21 · answer #4 · answered by Njd1975 3 · 0 0

you have to be careful here...
it can either be seen as "employer changed conditions that weren't suitable"
or
"conditions weren't suitable and employer did the best they could to accommodate"
if you belong to a union- pick up a phone dude

2007-03-27 19:48:57 · answer #5 · answered by Icarus 6 · 0 0

Not always. Employer changed terms of employment, not you.

2007-03-27 19:46:26 · answer #6 · answered by 1090 4 · 1 0

Yes.

2007-03-28 01:34:04 · answer #7 · answered by Taganan 3 · 0 0

sounds like it to me

2007-03-27 19:43:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers