2007-03-27 11:48:44 · 5 answers · asked by Natalia C 1 in Business & Finance ➔ Insurance
Only if they are saying you didn't pay. The front shows how much you paid, and when, and the back shows which account it was deposited in, and verifies that it didn't bounce.
2007-03-27 12:56:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The question is a bit open-ended. It depends, of course, upon the reason for the request. You cannot be compelled to provide any copies of any checks without a good reason. Normally you only need to produce a copy of a check in order to demonstrate that you have paid for an item. If you need it for that purpose, the front of the check will only demonstrate to whom it was made payable, and a date and amount. The back of the check will provide information to demonstrate that it was actually negotiated. This is necessary to show that you did more than just make out the check, but that it was actually negotiated, and, therefore, that the purpose for which the check was drawn has been fulfilled.
2007-03-27 18:59:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you do not show the front of the check, no one knows if you wrote one. If you do not show the back of the check, no one knows if the check was actually received and deposited by the person you should have paid with the check. It's very reasonable to show front and back of any check.
2007-03-27 20:47:17 · answer #3 · answered by laurel g 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A personal check from your account? OR, a check from your employer?
Usually the front, because there is a bar-code and/or a numeric code there.
2007-03-27 18:53:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It makes sense to provide both sides, regardless of who asks you, because the back shows exactly who cashed it and when.
2007-03-27 18:52:18 · answer #5 · answered by Venita Peyton 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋