if someday China decided to send 100,000 PLA as UN peace-keeping force to Iraq,what would USA think of it?
oppose it? or accept Chinese offer?
2007-03-27 06:58:27 · 14 answers · asked by sinoguy 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Has China ever taken part in peacekeeping?
2007-03-27 07:00:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
That would be awesome.
I think China is changing more so every day. Honestly I think that within the next 20 years China will no longer be communist or atleast not like it has been in the past.
When they backed the US against the N.Korea nuclear tests I was shocked. That told me right there that they would rather do the right thing than promote that useless hardline communist crap.
2007-03-27 07:07:48 · answer #2 · answered by h h 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't see that happening, but the PLA (probably along with some other Asian nations) will one day field a 200,000,000-troop Army! It's called the Kings of the East, found in Revelation:
Rev. 9:16-And the number of the army of the horsemen were two hundred thousand thousand: and I heard the number of them.
2007-03-27 07:12:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'd hope we accept it! The PLA is an honorable and professional organization. Chine is an old and great Nation. The West and China can easily share responsibilities governing this world.
2007-03-27 07:02:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Frankly, dont think a Peacekeeping Mission is Viable when there's a Active Terrorist Network conducting attacks.
2007-03-27 09:27:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because of the fact the united states of a did not "illegally invade oil-wealthy Iraq," i could would desire to assert that no, it is not hypocrisy; you purely don't understand the subject concerns in contact. First, there is extra oil under Alaska or in the Dakotas than in each and all of the midsection East blended, yet you libbies refuse to permit them to drill for it even nonetheless, a minimum of in Alaska, they overwhelmingly want to do it. 2nd, as we've informed you till now many cases, there grew to become into very lots of credible evidence to signify that there have been WMDs in Iraq that's why human beings like Hillary voted to pass into Iraq because of the fact the President has no authority to realize this on his own. So, you libbies overtly debated this for weeks, if not months, allowing Saddam to get any evidence of WMDs into Iran, that's the place maximum of them are actually. besides, regardless of if there have been not any WMDs as you insist, Iraq breached maximum, if not each and all of the agreements that bring about an end of wasteland hurricane. One grew to become into adequate to return in and take Baghdad. Thirdly, i hit upon it particularly telling which you help the tough crackdown on the Tibetans who purely want to be unfastened and self sustaining. in case you ballot the Iraqis, maximum are happy that the U. S. is there and don't want them to pass away extremely yet. i don't think of you will get a similar numbers in Tibet. Tibet proclaimed its independence from China in 1911. Tibet remained an self sustaining state till presently after the tip of the chinese language civil conflict, whilst on October one million, 1949, the persons's Republic of China grew to become into formally proclaimed in Beijing and right here 300 and sixty 5 days released an armed invasion of Tibet. The chinese language military of 40,000 adult men routed the unprepared protecting Tibetan military of purely 5,000. So, you have a situation with the U. S. "invading" Iraq as you declare, yet you have not have been given a situation with China invading and annexing Tibet. who's the hypocrite right here?
2016-11-23 19:35:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure they wouldn't mind, perhaps it would be a good reason to slow down the combat operations of the US and allow some of the longer-serving soldiers an opportunity to come home.
2007-03-27 07:03:07 · answer #7 · answered by Pfo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
America and China are both looking for and claiming oil reserves around the world. I don't think that the US wants to share this big fat mouse with any other fat cat.
2007-03-27 07:04:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If they go there and the UN didn't officially appoint them to do it, they can die with the rest of the Muslims there.
2007-03-27 07:47:24 · answer #9 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dude I would be for it those little dudes dont take no flak I would work with them going door to door in Bahgdad any day
Hiw Would I Know: yes they have Kosovo Bosina ect.
2007-03-27 07:08:43 · answer #10 · answered by Joel B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋