Wouldn't a suicide bomber qualify as "The World's Deadliest Job"?

Question

I'm thinking the crab boat thing is already overdone. It's time Mike Rowe went to the Middle East and followed around some suicide bombers. He could talk about the job benefits, the medical insurance,etc

Answer 1

That is not the World's Deadliest Job, it's the dumbest job on the planet. As Patton said," You don't win a war by dieing for your country. You win the war by making the bastard die for his." What good is a suicide bomber, did the Japanese prove that killing yourself for your country do nothing.

Answer 2

Each year at the Suicide Bombers' Reunion they plan to take up this question. However, no one shows up.

Answer 3

It would qualify as "The World's Stupidiest Job". It is amazing that they have an endless supply of volunteers. Maybe Mike Rowe can join up.

"No SOB ever won a war by dying for his country, he won it by making the other poor SOB die for his country"

Answer 4

easily buyt then agian maybe not beacuse he isnt the one who has the risk of dealing with the risk. the only risk is death. id say soldiers have the more dangerous job they are the one woh have to face the risk not the bomber

Answer 5

You don't have to work a job to earn a living, what about voluntary work? Volunteer's don't earn a thing, but it's still a job.

Answer 6

I wouldn't consider neither suicide nor bombing a "job", especially not when combined. I wonder what a resume would look like for that?

Answer 7

I would say its the worlds dumbest job definately.

Your earning potential, and potential for advancement sucks I bet.

Answer 8

No because you work at a job to earn a LIVING.

Answer 9

because a job is another word for occupation and that is not how the person is earning money

Answer 10

I would say it is the deadliest vocation...