English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Iran is saying the soldiers were in Iranian waters and Britain is saying they were in Iraqi waters.... I read that the borders were disputed where the soldiers were taken captive so no one really knows which they were in. What actions do you think should be taken, if any??

2007-03-27 06:54:37 · 9 answers · asked by deliwvu 3 in Politics & Government Military

9 answers

This is stupid. I would love for the world to just take care of all the Muslim Extremists instead of all this political ****. But...that's exactly what we're supposed to be here to prevent. So that's out of the question.

What does Iran want for the soldiers? An admission and apology. Just give it to them. Just say, "my bad, misunderstanding" and call it a day. If they renig, then go to war. Until then, it's not a big deal to just say "I'm sorry, we believed we were in Iraqi waters". Even if you're not wrong. Jesus, it's not a big deal.

2007-03-29 10:19:36 · answer #1 · answered by Chaney34 5 · 0 0

They should be beheaded by the "religion of peace" captors. Bush should be blamed and CNN ( also known as the Anna Nicole Network) could do a report comparing GITMO captives with the beheaded Brits. You know, things like Muslims NOT getting time to pray, not having good muslim food ,having to use toilet paper etc.

Then after that report Keith Oberman could make fun of the soldiers for "losing their heads". Comedy Central's Jon Stewart could offer some funny barbs about the soldiers saving the British Army money by not needing helmets anymore. Then they could talk about the need for the USA and Britain to be put on trial for war crimes.

2007-03-27 07:03:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

for sure they're being compelled to assert that they entered Iranian territory. examine their physique language, seem at their faces, hear to them talk. those sailors don't think a ingredient they're asserting in Iran's video clips. there's a distinction between the Iranians we are protecting in Iraq and the British sailors. The Iranians we are protecting have been in Iraq while they have been captured, the British sailors weren't in Iranian waters in accordance to GPS information released via the British government and the assertion made via the deliver the sailors have been observing the time. To the suitable of my awareness, American troops do no longer circulate away Iraq and enter Iran for the purpose of shooting Iranians. The Iranians did circulate away Iran to catch the sailors.

2016-10-20 01:40:37 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

This is a preempted sign of war.
This and many other actions Iran vs Western countries are leading up to something much greater.
It wouldn't surprise me if we invaded Iran.
If we back off Iran, Iraq will have a greater chance for peace-then Saudia Arabia and the United states would own the largest oil reserve in the world-that is my take.

2007-03-27 07:01:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think the world should ignore Iranian government. I don't think Iranian government really cares about British soldiers being in their waters. They are looking for attention. That's all they want.
Can you imagine how many Iranians are really suffering from their government being this stupid???

2007-03-29 08:25:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well, lets look at this another way. If an Iranian ship was found in British waters, what should be done? I suggest tit-for-tat...

2007-03-27 06:57:55 · answer #6 · answered by Super Ruper 6 · 1 0

I suggest a British-Israeli tactical conventional nuclear strike, so the world doesn't have this problem with Iran anymore!

2007-03-27 06:59:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Sit it out.

2007-03-28 16:30:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

nuke iran...yesterday..

2007-03-27 06:59:18 · answer #9 · answered by badjanssen 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers