BEFORE you answer this question, read the article at this link.
Start reading below the dotted line, as the first part is actually located in the article, as well.
http://www.nextfoundation.org/gtblog/?p=79#more-79
2007-03-27 06:34:14 · 9 answers · asked by Mr_Masks99 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Oh, and please do not post any rude comments or insults..
I am not interested in attitudes... thanks.
2007-03-27 06:35:35 · update #1
Not at all.....It is the most sensible thing we can do to insure our National Security and maybe the worlds.
2007-03-27 06:39:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
First let me say that this statement is false:
"We deposed Saddam Hussein. Whether Saddam
Hussein was directly involved in the 9/11 terrorist
attack or not, it is undisputed that Saddam has been
actively supporting the terrorist movement for
decades Saddam is a terrorist! Saddam is, or was,
a weapon of mass destruction, responsible for the
deaths of probably more than a 1,000,000 Iraqis and
2,000,000 Iranians"
It is a fact the Saddam Hussein did not want Islamic extremist in his country and had nothing to do with 9/11. He was responsible for the deaths of 153 Kurds by gas.
He was a dictator that kept his country at peace with several religions.
If there ever is a chance for terrorists to get a hold of nuclear weapons it would be Pakistan, India, or Iran. These are the only countries that have that kind of volatility.
There is propaganda about the Iraq War. I would further my reading "The Project for the New American Century" to find out who and why America took an offensive strike at Iraq, for reasons other than 9/11. They have a web site, and are happy to share their ideologies about attacking the middle east.
2007-03-27 13:56:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That was interesting reading.....
I see the war on terror and the war in Iraq in much the same way as the beginning of WWII. Except this time the roles are reversed. Now, WE'RE the ones fighting at the beginning because it directly affects us and the rest of the world is slow to get involved.
We are truly blessed to have allies like the UK/AU. I hope that we can always have each other's back. Even if that were to mean we go with them into Iran, God forbid.
2007-03-27 13:43:50 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Iraq war had the right intentions going in, the followthrough is what went awry.
2007-03-27 13:55:07 · answer #4 · answered by Luis 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thanks but I don't need to read another article, whether pro or against to know that what we did and are doing in Iraq is Righteous!
2007-03-27 13:38:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
In my opinon I do not agree with the war.I feel we should worry about our own country and not everyone elses. I do support our troops for the job that they are made to do, but I do not agree with the President for taking us to war.
2007-03-27 13:39:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Im for killing the Jihad now and helping the Iraqi people all at once, besides it keeps my busy
2007-03-27 13:42:44 · answer #7 · answered by Joel B 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no but I do believe that we are taking it too far.
2007-03-27 13:38:29 · answer #8 · answered by steven h 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, it is not wrong.
2007-03-27 13:38:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋