2007-03-27 04:40:40 · 6 answers · asked by U-98 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
from a previous question's answers about rainbows
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070327080724AAXNVtJ&r=w
2007-03-27 04:42:36 · update #1
no, I had serious answers saying that there were no rainbows before the flood because it never rained before the flood.
It is not my statement that there was no rain before that. That is why I am asking.
2007-03-27 05:03:32 · update #2
Wasn't necessary to accomplish His purpose.
There is more than one way to moisturize the earth.
2007-03-27 04:43:14 · answer #1 · answered by Uncle Thesis 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What makes you think there was no rain.? There could be no life without rain. Or do you mean why was that the first flood. We do not even know that. There may have been many floods of this nature we have seen signs of this all over the world in different isolated places
2007-03-27 04:57:03 · answer #2 · answered by Carolyn 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
surely He allowed rain before the flood/how else would the vegetation grow-they were all farmers
2007-03-27 04:51:17 · answer #3 · answered by swc 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you serious? I have seen a bunch of questions related to it not raining before the flood. Does it really say that , and do people really believe it. WTF!
2007-03-27 04:50:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He didn't know how to make clouds.
How absurd it that? I am sometimes truly amazed at the ignorance that abounds here.
2007-03-27 04:44:27 · answer #5 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hahahaha. Because before the flood, he didn't need rain to slaughter most of the world's population. Duh!
2007-03-27 04:45:37 · answer #6 · answered by ....... 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋