until the day they committed a habitual unaccptable attitudes taht is answering back to officer & senior NCO bec it is their right they say.I Paddle them with the butt of te M16 as maximum punishment agreed in the unit & as guidance by our Commanding Officer. But what happen our commanding Officer made the complain bec this privates was tellinh they lose their respect towards me as their EX-O then he relieve from the duty without asking my side & without punishing the privates.second, this privates states in their sworn statements that i have STD'd, immoral(dating with friendly forces), always say bad words, puch them & make gossip that will degrade them, that i downloaded & collect bold CD's where they found inside my room & tc. My point is, are they allowed to say what they want?and do want they like?i came from the field as Artillery officer.I am new to ahndleng female soldiers & shock to their undesirable attitude.please help me,i want them to be punish & discharge
2007-03-27 03:48:31 · 27 answers · asked by jane_ice00 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
My eyes hurt now. I couldn't read any more....your typing really hurt my eyes.
It takes two to tango
2007-03-27 03:52:57 · answer #1 · answered by twinmomm 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
How did you become an officer without knowing proper grammar and spelling? I think you are totally a poser. Go back and watch TV. Nothing like what you are saying can happen. The first offense of talking back to a Senior NCO or Officer will be strict punishment and there's no such thing as anyone allowed to paddle with an M-16. Grow up. Besides we're using M-4s now but you wouldn't know that because you are not there.
2007-03-27 03:58:53 · answer #2 · answered by madbaldscotsman 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If you truly are an officer, I honestly feel for your troops.
Just as a side note, according to the Chief of Staff of the Army, in written correspondence, every reference to an American Soldier will have "Soldier" with a capitol "S". You might want to keep that in the back of your mind when preparing written statements in the future.
Anyway, to get to the gist of your question...if you were an Executive Officer (or XO, not EX-O as you wrote), and were relived without just cause, you need to take it up with the IG. You should have received a written relief for cause, which will go into your record...If you truly are innocent (which I honestly can't tell as your statement is so poorly worded), you have to weigh the goods against the bads of taking this up the chain of command.
Overall, if you are making a career as an Army officer, you're going to need to work on your written communication. When you reach ILE, you have to write a LOT of essays...
2007-03-27 03:58:24 · answer #3 · answered by Robert N 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
this may be a situation in many the protection tension provider branches, possibly extra so interior the Marines via indoors subculture. that is all a query of what movements are allowed via the management and that are suppressed. people are not allowed to rape and sexually harass people interior the civilian worldwide, and that's because of the fact the powers that be quite implement those regulations. needless to say, the regulations are not being enforced interior the Marines, from the backside ranges to the optimal. After some people lost their jobs, you may quickly discover that the point of rape and harassment may be regarding the comparable because it is interior something of the inhabitants.
2016-12-15 10:00:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I find it hard to believe that you are an officer in the United States Army.........Officers are supposed to be literate, and should know that you can not strike any soldier as punishment. If you did indeed strike a soldier with the butt of your M-16, you should count your lucky stars that you are not on your way to Leavenworth.
2007-03-27 03:57:29 · answer #5 · answered by GregK 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Judging by the grammar this has got to be a joke post. Especially as adultery is a pretty serious offense in the military and if you were truly military you would know what the real recourse is.
2007-03-27 03:54:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Do you actually expect me to believe you are an officer? What is the point of all this incoherent babble? I can't decipher what the question is.
2007-03-27 05:04:49 · answer #7 · answered by bugs280 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Take an English class then, write a report and pass it up the ladder
2007-03-27 03:52:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Yup, you're an officer. Unable to correctly express yourself in English so everyone can understand you. Your lack of knowledge of grammar only exceeds your piss poor spelling. Now go back to your game boy, lad.
And thanks for the chuckle.
2007-03-27 04:54:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Honey, you are going to have to try this again. Take your time. Try using the spell check. I do not think anyone here can figure out what you are asking.
2007-03-27 03:59:44 · answer #10 · answered by T S 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋