A simple yes or no will surfice.
2007-03-27 03:09:37 · 15 answers · asked by 1saintofGod 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Rev 22:18 ¶ For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and [from] the things which are written in this book.
2007-03-27 03:19:54 · answer #1 · answered by tas211 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
The Gospel of Judas that I know of has been around for centuries. It is of Gnostic origin, not considered inspired by God, and written long after Christ and the Disciples died. It is not an eyewitness account like the other Gospels. It did not pass muster, as they say, in the early church, when the canonical form of the Scriptures was being put together. Therefore, whether or not it is even referenced in the Bible, like the Book of Enoch, the Gospel of Judas is not included...nor do I believe can it be verified that Judas even wrote it.
2007-03-27 03:19:59 · answer #2 · answered by BowtiePasta 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a real Gospel could be one written by technique of someone who knew Jesus and became divinely inspired, mutually with Thomas, Judas, Mary Magdalene, Philip, James etc. A pretend gospel could be one written by technique of someone who did not understand Jesus, that's declared that 0.5 the gospels interior the Bible were written by technique of human beings that did not understand Jesus. no matter if or not they were divinely inspired, the presence of Jesus may be the most precise idea for a Christian gospel. The gnostic gospels may no longer all were written of their modern form by technique of those whose names they undergo, besides the indisputable fact that the unique form of those gospels could were from disciple named. they look to comprehend the actual teachings of Jesus extra valuable than an outstanding form of those that were lined. at the same time as the council of Nicea determined which gospels to position in the Bible they were politically inspired to comprise those which conformed to their personal teachings. God never stopped talking yet many forgot the thanks to take heed to.
2016-12-02 21:39:25 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no...to show you just how effective his gospel was, Judas killed himself when he realized that he was responsible for the death of Christ. So how in the world will some suicidal demon ever feel like they can have a gospel that people will attest to.
2007-03-27 03:27:00 · answer #4 · answered by Nish 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
Gospel in itself is meant to honor. Judas was a traitor. There was no honor in him. So "gospel according to Judas" is a contradiction in terms.
2007-03-27 03:24:08 · answer #5 · answered by se-ke 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The idea that Jesus asked Judas to betray him is ridiculous. Why would he put Judas in that position when all he had to do was turn himself in to the Romans?
2007-03-27 03:38:22 · answer #6 · answered by Robin W 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
All of the Gospels, canonical or not, are pure fiction.
2007-03-27 03:12:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope. But it is as true as the rest.
2007-03-27 03:13:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
It was written too late.
†
2007-03-27 03:12:47 · answer #9 · answered by Jeanmarie 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No
2007-03-27 03:15:19 · answer #10 · answered by Mayonaise 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋