It makes me a lot happier to be taking part in the, eh-hem, fertility ritual.
2007-03-27 02:56:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well for one, circumcision has nothing whatsoever to do with fertility! It is simply a sign of the covenent between God and the people, Israel.
.
2007-03-27 09:56:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Hatikvah 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
In the old Hebrew tradition, it had nothing to do with fertility. It was simply a sign of a covenant between God and the Israelites. Who knows why they chose that particular sign, but that is all it is.
2007-03-27 09:56:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by BaseballGrrl 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think it had to do with keeping things clean. My understanding is that when you bathed once a month in river water you run the risk of some serious bacterial problems with you guy bits and so trimming things a little meant less folds of skin for the bacteria to breed in.
2007-03-27 09:58:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by kllr.queen 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
I don't see how chopping off part of a baby's wee-wee balances with any fertility ritual.
.
2007-03-27 09:58:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Weird Darryl 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are all jungle rites that have carried over into the present day. Sort of like tattooing. Things one tribe did to make it 'better' than other tribes.
2007-03-27 09:57:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It doesn't balance and it's not supposed to. It has nothing to do with fertility.
What an odd question.
2007-03-27 09:57:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tavita 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Coffee gives me the runs.
2007-03-27 09:56:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by poseidenneptune 5
·
1⤊
4⤋
there is no good reason.....
2007-03-27 09:56:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋