If there was no plausible way for non life to make the first cells
If there was no plausible way for single cell organisms to make multi cell organisms
If there was no plausible way to expain the rise of sexual animals from asexual
If there was non increasing gentic information in every point mutation
If there is no plausable way to explain the irreducable complexities and revolutionary changes we see in biological systems
If the fossil evidense speaks of catastophism not gradualism and lacks transition with major animals appearing abriuptly
If the ape to man evidense aint there and the evidense for Lucy as ancenstress aint there
would you believe in a creator, or would you take it by faith that evolution somehow happened
2007-03-27 00:25:21 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
no - the concept of a god is still nonsense - also which god?
2007-03-27 00:38:52 · answer #1 · answered by Freethinking Liberal 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This is a rather bizarre formulation. You are appealing to our sense of logic and then asking us to abandon that same sense and adopt a non-logical viewpoint in its place. Which do you want us to be, logical or illogical?
I suppose you think you have presented a list of logical flaws in evolution. I've a PhD in evolutionary history and I could zap every one of them to dust. For starters: the evolution of the barnacle demonstrates the divergence of asexual into sexual animals. Primitive barnacles are asexual, then they evolve a separate male organism. Just because it's not plausible to you doesn't mean that people who've taken the time to study and test these ideas properly are wrong. Irreducible complexity has been demolished over and over again. The fossil record does not speak of catastrophism. And so on.
Don't ask me to explain any of the others though, or barnacles in greater depth - you looked up the points you posted, do yourself a favour and channel your energies into learning something substantive by yourself.
2007-03-27 01:00:05 · answer #2 · answered by Bad Liberal 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People dont really know if evolution happened.
They take it in faith now.
Who was alive then?
Jesus came that is surer then evolution and they believe evolution.
Thousands saw his miracles and believed and the othe 80% crucified him and said his powers came from satan and others say he was a magician.
The truth is people want and like to live wickedly and will not read or even pick up the bible and listen to its council and try. They much rather reason things and say show me a sign.
It is the truth and it is just some people have faith and know God exists and believe it in there hearts and others dont and will not sacrifice there worldly desires to know if he does.
There are 2 things that are sure we live and we die.
Remember that people you cant hide for ever.
Your deeds will be revealed
2007-03-27 02:20:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is possible with God as the creator. We don't know how long it took God to make everything. Time has no meaning to God. The Bible says there was darkness on the face of the deep in the beginning. No way to judge a 24 hour day as we know it.
2007-03-27 00:35:56 · answer #4 · answered by Cal 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would wait for a credible theory to come about. I wouldn't just accept another theory with no evidence. I might even die not having a credible theory found yet. But all of those will never happen. Those have all been scientifically found to support evolution.
2007-03-27 05:26:02 · answer #5 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that is a lot of 'ifs' buddy.
and then still I would find some magic sky daddy a very unbelievable proposition, especially one from the mainstream religions. I might become a deist, or wait for the real mechanism to be discovered. Probably the latter. We currently don't understand abiogenesis, but that doesn't mean 'god diddit'.
2007-03-27 00:32:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Many people believe in God and in evolution. They just don't believe people came from the sea or apes.Science has proved evolution but just because we share DNA with apes does not mean that we came from them. Question if we evolved from apes why are they still here and why haven't evolved yet?
2007-03-27 00:38:30 · answer #7 · answered by norielorie 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
even if we have all these answers there are many still unanswered which will be answered tomorrow or day after..
thus there is no point in this question.. But as u asked this I have to answer thus i will say all those who belive now will believe and others wont ,, as there are still many questions which are unanswered
2007-03-27 00:30:11 · answer #8 · answered by CS Deol 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there was solid scientific evidence for another theory I would have no problem accepting it. You have not given it.
Good science is not based on forcing evidence to fit pre-conceived ideas.
2007-03-27 00:32:23 · answer #9 · answered by in a handbasket 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even if Creationists were to COMPLETELY dismantle and prove evolution was indeed not the way life developed on this planet, it DOES NOT MAKE THEIR STANCE CORRECT BY DEFAULT.
2007-03-27 00:46:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
These answers seen to be saying, at least one of them directly, with regard to your first "if" ... drum roll please ... that they are able to tell us how life derived from non-life.
This is news of such magnitude that I wonder why they have not shared it with the rest of the world, or at least the scientists, who have sought that information for hundreds of years.
I guess there will always be stubborn people like me, who in spite of the evidence presented here, thank God for all of creation.
†
2007-03-27 00:41:42 · answer #11 · answered by cmw 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋