My personal view is that it is further proof they can't think for themselves.
It isn't just christians, by the way. The muslims do the same thing.
2007-03-26 23:58:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
I believe that refers to me.Well,I have 2 questions for you.Did you even read any of the ''silly'' christian science magazine cuts?I'm sure you did'nt.You say there are ''vast libraries of proof of evolution''.Let me send you some more of the vast libraries of proof of creationism(which you would'nt even read).Oh,and you seem to think if it's accepted by the majority it's true.So I take it you don't do your own research--your belief in evolution is probably just blind faith(confirmation:you did'nt even examine my reply).Second question:why did you ask a question that you knew would provoke long replies if you did'nt even want those replies?I fail to see the logic in that.But please,if you want to argue with me,just first read my ''silly christian science magazine'' cuts.It's only fair you examine my side of the story.I examined yours. That's why I don't believe in it..
2007-03-27 07:16:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
"vast libraries" of evidence and proof of Evolution.... or of evolution (there IS a significant difference...) ? I for one would love to study this evidence, please point me there.
P.S. please note all you who said that us "westerners" or "Christians" don't know our science that I'll bet without "copying and pasting" I can come up with more instances of scientists falsely claiming they have found a missing link than you will be able to find current "missing links".... it is the same story year after year. The scientific community comes up with more "evidence" and then finds that it is not true.
And don't even try to tell me that none of you uber intelligent people ever use the internet to go and find information and paste it here as well because I see it all the time.
2007-03-27 07:07:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by bigD4316 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Believe me, its not just in the section. I see it in Zoology and other areas. To me a well thought out, concise answer is worth a hundred cut and paste jobs.
2007-03-27 07:15:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by in a handbasket 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Of course you are right! I always cut and past the stuff I have already written! WHY are you so full of hate for something you supposedly dont believe in? Every one of your posts is something attacking Christians! If it is all not true, why are you so freaked out about it? Why are you so afraid of something you believe is not there?
2007-03-27 10:35:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
if you give a valuable answer for this question then i'll tell you why...you are saying that some christians are so stupid ,have you get to know these people really or just sending that stupid question just by reading answer of others.do you thing GOD is clever ?if yes ,then yes christian are clever.if you say no, then that's why you've got a brain like this only to judge others;remember this don't judge others so GOD won't judge you.
2007-03-27 07:06:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by emma 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because we're tired of the trashy cut and paste answers you put on here. If you don't believe in God and making useless comments only discredits yourself and aitheism and scientology. Stupid.
2007-03-27 07:11:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
They put long answer or whatever is because it is fun and a big achievement to annoyed some like you who have problem and cribs in anything and everything
2007-03-27 07:00:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by beauty_behind_the_pain 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I see more Muslims doing this. There answers are 6 paragraphs long!. I guess they think more is better, dazzle them with garbage text.
2007-03-27 07:27:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by MST3K 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are being hard on them. You should remember that their foundation is the bible - which they hardly interogate. Now that we had been calling on them to give alternative resource, they genuinely believe that cut and paste from christian science mags is being cool and provides alternative references.
2007-03-27 07:10:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
They are weak in science knowledge, large number of people in the west not good in studies.
2007-03-27 07:04:19
·
answer #11
·
answered by Talha 4
·
1⤊
1⤋