O.J. Killed them. He is guilty as sin.
2007-03-26 17:00:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
1) he has been proven innocent by his peers
2) My always thoughts were by working in the medical field was if he did do it how did he manage go back into a white carpeted bedroom and not have blood everywhere? With that brutal slaying, him a male (lol) ;I know that when a body is heated from him "running away from scene, hurrying to change, hurrying to get rid of evidence" there had to have been a lot more blood than they ever showed proof of.
3) think this was the other guy or else OJ paid someone big bucks
2007-03-27 08:02:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gypsygrl 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
OJ was found Innocent by the same laws that protect you. all that matters that a court of law and a jury found him not guilty
2007-03-27 08:07:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by watchman_1900 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i already have a strong opinion on the matter and remember it well.there is no doubt in my mind that oj is guilty as hell in nicole and rons coldblooded murders.the only thing i am unsure of is how involved was kato kaelin in this whole mess.we may never know but GOD does and he will judge.good luck.
2007-03-27 00:07:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by dixie58 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is innocent for the rest of his life, since in America you are first assumed innocent untill proven guilty, and the court found him innocent, so he has to be, since we have to assume he is by the US Constitution, and since we have to because the court ruled he was.
2007-03-27 00:03:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think that
1) a lot of the "evidence" faked.
2) The time line made it impossible for OJ to have done it.
3) He may well know who did.
2007-03-27 00:10:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
NO! That monster belongs in prison. His freedom shows how rigged the judicial system in this country is...but I don't like politics and laws...so I guess my opinion doesn't count. Lol.
2007-03-27 00:07:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by c00kies 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If he is guilty, he will have to answer to a higher authority than a human judge after he dies.
2007-03-27 12:43:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by WC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Look, the DNA matched. He wasn't convicted because the jury didn't know DNA from shinola.
2007-03-27 00:11:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by open4one 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is as innocent as a fox in a henhouse. Good Day.
2007-03-27 00:01:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I see no one asking these questions about Robert Blake.Gee i wonder why?
2007-03-28 18:02:16
·
answer #11
·
answered by Lady T 5
·
0⤊
0⤋