English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When we talk about how Bush entered this war unilaterally and with fabricated evidence do we forget about things like this? This is from 10 countries that felt it was time for action.Even the French and the Germans felt that Sadam was harboring Weapons of mass destruction but felt that he should be given another chance to comply.

www.pwhce.org/docvil.html
Please check out the link and let me know if you still think it is an illegal war.

2007-03-26 15:04:58 · 4 answers · asked by Kungfudad 1 in Politics & Government Military

4 answers

Bush did not fabricate evidence. He read the U.N. reports, (the same ones Hillary and Kerry read when they supported the war) 400+ pages detailing the threat Iraq posed.

Ask the 300,000 dead kurds we have found in mass graves about the "fabricated evidence"

Unless you are willing to contribute something other than your own feces to society, keep your mouth shut, sip on your starbucks, and go to the mall or something you coward.

Let the professionals handle it.

The only reason you are free is because better men than you do your fighting for you and keep you free.

2007-03-26 15:30:53 · answer #1 · answered by Voice of Liberty 5 · 0 0

What I remember most was the scene where Powell stood in front of the UN and held up some papers and said "We have proof that Saddam has weapons of mass destruction" and in the background you could hear several UN members laughing.

2007-03-26 22:16:57 · answer #2 · answered by pilot 5 · 0 1

I never thought it was an illegal war, just a stupid one. That's true regardless of what a bunch of Europeans said.

2007-03-26 22:32:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes
but don't tell libs about it
their heads will explode

2007-03-26 22:10:20 · answer #4 · answered by ULTRA150 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers