They left England to escape state religion, to have the freedom to practice their own religion.
But, in essence, weren't they saying; "We don't want the King to dictate to our followers how they have to live... because that's OUR job."
I mean really, they wanted the freedom to practice one of the most oppressive forms of Christianity ever conceieved. Isn't there a certain amount of absurdity to this?
2007-03-26
13:55:42
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Eldritch
5
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Pat:
I love my Country, but that is actually a pretty good argument for heading north...
2007-03-26
14:06:26 ·
update #1