If so, isn't the move from monotheism to atheism an additional improvement? It's just keeping up the same trend of subtracting gods....
2007-03-26 13:46:24 · 5 answers · asked by Eldritch 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Super Squeak:
I'm trying to see the disrespect here. I guess you consider disagreement to be synonymous.
Which is ironic, because respect is a two way street...
2007-03-26 13:58:02 · update #1
the purely those who ever claimed monotheism is extra valuable than polytheism are in all likelihood monotheists. you may argue that the perception in a unmarried god can unite human beings more effective than the perception in a number of gods, yet there are a determination of remarkable exceptions. Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Vikings, Indians were all polytheistic societies that had greater civilizations for his or her era. in reality, the rising superpower, China, is a majority polytheistic society. the single common thread between polytheism, monotheism, and atheism is the actual undeniable reality that they are all are religions. you may argue with me yet i imagine the time period you're fairly searching for to describe your self is irreligious.
2016-12-02 21:01:08 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
try respecting peoples beliefs once in a while. Maybe you wouldnt have to spend so much time on the internet.
2007-03-26 13:50:17 · answer #2 · answered by nobody 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That's an interesting point to be quite honest with you.
2007-03-26 13:55:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Let me know when we are at negative 86.
2007-03-26 13:51:56 · answer #4 · answered by MONK 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You can say that again.
2007-03-26 13:50:16 · answer #5 · answered by Rallie Florencio C 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋