Illegal immigrants only want what is best for them and what will suit their needs. So when concerned citizens speak out on the issue, they are dubbed "racists". That is wrong. We're not targeting a certain nationality. We are only addressing the issue of illegal immigration which is putting a strain on our economy. Yes, this country is founded on immigrants, but NOT illegal immigrants.
Instead of complaining about not getting enought rights in America, they should be concered about changing things in their own homelands.
2007-03-26 13:13:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
It doesn't make you racist to not want illegal immigrants here. I am 1/2 mexican and 1/2 greek and I am all for sending illegals back to their country. There are many immigrants that worked hard to study and take tests and waited years to be legal and I think it is unfair that others can just walk across a line to get here. There is nothing wrong with wanting a better life, just follow the rules to do it.
2007-03-26 16:11:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Phoebe 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
ok, so if Congress and the President exchange the regulation day after today removing all barriers to immigration, you will help it, precise? Are you beneficial your in ordinary terms concern with unlawful immigration is that that's a offender offense? by way of fact the government ought to very particularly exchange the regulation. you will ought to return up with a diverse argument, then. Being anti-immigration or anti-unlawful immigration isn't intrinsically racist. of direction no longer. that is inflammatory and stupid. you need to no longer take that grievance heavily. although, i think of a few people use the "regulation" as a guise to mask their actual emotions on the concern. In some circumstances, i recognize racism performs a factor. If no longer racism, then xenophobia and nativism. nor is a sturdy trait for a individual to have. devoid of understanding your actual motives, i could no longer probable say why you're so adverse to unlawful immigration. i recognize that the regulation is beside the point by way of fact the regulation isn't a static rigidity. The regulation ought to mirror what's precise and incorrect. So, once you demonstrate why you think of the regulation is physically powerful, particularly than resorting to helping the regulation for the regulation's sake, then i will have the ability to render a decision. As for me, I disagree with the guidelines on the books. I disagree with multiple rules on the books. And for those rules that I do like, i do no longer attempt to justify their existence by utilising asserting that they exist. that is around reasoning.
2016-10-01 13:04:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Racist is the pro amnesty last desperate effort to save their illegals . Instead of trying to talk to the people in a reasonable way the pro amnesty have decided the best way to salvage their campaign is to belittled people and insult them for being real enough to express their points of view. How this works from my stand point is every time you express something the pro amnesty does not like they will respond with the word racist it's built in like the tide going in and out, it's a natural built in response, they use it so much the word has lost what it is really suppose to mean . I just don't see how they want to be taken seriously when they fall back on the same failed word a billion times people just write them off. The word racist is now about effected as is the waving the Mexican flag.
2007-03-26 13:16:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Zoe 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
Calling someone a racist or a sexist or a bigot is a proven way to derail all reasonable debate and logical thought. It's just easier to take political power when Reason is out of the way.
Always denounce your enemies with emotional ranting and ravings. Make sure they can't get a word in edgewise.
It's been working for years. The French Revolution invented the modern form, but it was perfected by the Third Communist International and has spread like wildfire throughout formerly intelligent and logical nations.
2007-03-26 13:06:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Boomer Wisdom 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Because some people are childish. Instead of being adult enough to look at someone else's point of view and actually respect what it is you're trying to say, they do the first thing that they know... start slinging insults and labeling people when they don't agree with you. I too have a HUGE problem with illegal immigrants, and it isn't because I am racist, it's because I'm sick of the lack of respect that HISPANIC immigrants have for our nation and our traditions... like speaking English. You're not racist... you just have the balls to say something about a situation that is obviously only getting worse.
2007-03-26 12:56:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by TmB 3
·
4⤊
2⤋
I'm Against illegal aliens plain and simple breaking the law your an criminal.
Nationality is not a RACE
2007-03-26 12:59:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Because the people who are doing it illegally are upset and have to express their feelings.
It's the same with people who wave family that's tried to cross the border illegally.
2007-03-26 13:16:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Rachel D 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I agree. It has nothing to do with race. Granted, the majority of immigrants are hispanic, but if they were another race draining our economy, we would be saying something about that too. Although, we don't complain much about the flood of Asians either. Why? Generally, they contribute much more to our society and economy.
2007-03-26 12:53:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by CC 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
same reason that calling Israel an illegal occupation makes you a Jew hater. People are incapable of differentiating fact from fiction or an issue from the propaganda.
2007-03-26 12:54:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋