i am NOT talking about religion (the bible) i am talking about faith (in god[s]).
2007-03-26 09:38:47 · 29 answers · asked by Loathing 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
remember i am NOT talking about religion. religion and faith are TWO different things.
its VERY possible to have faith and not belong to a religion... heck i am in that boat right now.
2007-03-26 09:50:36 · update #1
Yes I believe they need each other as much as both sides hate to admit that. God is the universe it is part of everything and so is science.
That is my view point. If you believe otherwise I would love to hear your theories.
Cheers
2007-03-26 09:42:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Everything must have a beginning. So in studying science or religion we must start at the beginning. Right off the bat there's a conflict. Religion claims creation while science teaches evolution.
If you have no "religion" what is your bases for your belief in "god" ?
2007-03-26 09:55:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
by way of fact this place is finished insane. God would not say He created guy by utilising evolution by using abiogenesis from astrochemistry of the nebulae of supernovas yet from airborne dirt and dust of the floor. those are actually not the comparable and would have be completely out of my mid like each and all of the time to think of that they are the comparable. no longer in ordinary terms this however the vast Bang from no longer something disprove each God. you will quicker or later bypass mad to hold those believes. This BS approximately Ex Nihilo being the comparable as no longer something is so crammed with it. First the term Ex Nihilo became used to point that Hr created devoid of utilising commencing matterials particularly made or shaped with commencing matterials; and the is likewise postbibical ( made by utilising adult males ). Quantum Genesis says that no longer something is very explosive in a quantum experience giving develop to spacetime and remember is spatial distortion. In essense in present day time God has been shown to be the main best liar in historic previous plenty so as that His very existence is a finished lie. And any who tries to unite those 2 will bypass mad. yet why do desire to unite them? the only reason is by way of fact you recognize technological understanding is right.
2016-10-01 12:51:11 · answer #3 · answered by lieser 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great scientists like Johannes KEPLER saw God's magnificance and constantly gave praise to God Almighty for his wonderful laws built into nature. He was a creationist.
So was Isaac NEWTON.......and he wrote 1 million words about his LITERAL belief in the Scripture. He was a creationist.
" I have a fundamental belief in the Word of God....I study the Bible daily". - Isaac Newton
The electromagnetic equations of James Clerk Maxwell attest to the Magnificant mathematical inginuity of the Creator.
He was a Creationist.
Louis Pasteur...was a avid Christian and Fundamental Bible believer....
Thousands of other scientists freely admit it was their faith in God and Jesus Christ that led them to great discoveries...
2007-03-26 09:45:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion, no. Faith in God or gods requires a willing suspension of disbelief and the innate questioning nature of man, which goes totally against the scientific method.
2007-03-26 09:43:15 · answer #5 · answered by H.u.S 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
of course it can:D
I am both a Keen Scientist and believer in religion.
Why do some people say that the big bang and evolution defy what many of the other creation storys state? Is it not possible that maybe God used the big bang and evolution and the many other seemingly conflicting ideas , to produce a good pro-creational world?
2007-03-26 09:43:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Not really. How does science fuse with Hinduism, Buddism, Shinto, etc? Whenever a religion tries to fuse with science, its usually an a priori. Its flawed.
2007-03-26 09:42:38 · answer #7 · answered by Maikeru 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I believe God needs to follow his own rules (the creation, the law of physics, etc...) If you believe that God is perfect and can never change then you need to believe that he follows rules. Those rules would be science. If the current scientific rules don't allow for god, then the rules might not be completely accurate.
2007-03-26 09:45:18 · answer #8 · answered by Kenneth B 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
they are two separate disciplines and as such cannot go/work together. the aims of the two are basically the same, but the methods used to achieve those aims are radically different. both seek to explain the world around us, one way using reason, logic and experience and the other using myth, legend and fantasy. both have their appeal to the human animal, but only one of these could produce, through ages of experimentation, trial and error, and empirical evidence, the medium and the media on which to express this very thought...
2007-03-26 09:48:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
they can not. if you have faith then you must believe in the bible or Koran or some other holy book. if your holy book claims how the world began then you can not believe in science and have faith at the same time.
2007-03-26 09:42:34 · answer #10 · answered by Speak freely 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋