Both are good vehicles with the same basic maintenance needs and expenses and the same general repair costs...buy whichever one YOU like better!
2007-03-26 09:25:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by malemute1 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I had a Subaru Forester and loved it. The only thing I didn't like about it is that the back seats didn't have enough legroom for full-sized adults.
One thing I liked about it was that it has some unusual design elements. It has a flat, horizontally opposed engine like the old VW Beetle, it has a distributorless ignition, full time AWD (you have to pay extra for 4WD on the CR-V), outside air temp gauge, the biggest moonroof I ever saw, little storage bins everywhere, no external antenna and that's just for starters. It is terrific in the snow and ice. If I won the multi-million dollar lottery jackpot I would still drive a subaru forester, but I might still go and get a flashy convertible to drive on sunny days.
2007-03-26 09:39:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by maxnull 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both are great cars. Both hold their value well.. the CRV has more of a "younger" appeal while the forrester seems to belong to the older, responsible generation ;)
2007-03-26 09:31:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by violetpikkles 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both good but I'd have to give the edge to CR-V, lower maintenance down the road, a little more refined, smoother
vehicle.
2007-03-26 14:47:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by wheeler 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you're looking for reliability, fuel efficiency, and resale value, the CRV.
If you're looking for performance, the Forester XT.
2007-03-26 09:22:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ferret 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
CR-V by a mile.
2007-03-26 09:21:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋