What you have to consider with these bulbs is there disgusting level of dark cloudy lighting. Anyone who willingly puts these bulbs in must have a screw loose
Give me bright sparkly halogens any day.
2007-03-29 11:19:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by jojo5050 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In addition to using less energy to make the same amount of light, as other posters have mentioned, energy-saving light bulbs also last for several times the life of old-fashioned incandescent bulbs. This means you have to change it less frequently, which means a saving in the energy and materials needed to manufacture/package/transport the bulb.
2007-03-26 09:04:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Daniel R 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
An energy saving light bulb produces less heat. A regular incandescent bulb produces light by creating a high temperature.
2007-03-26 09:25:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Poor one 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They don't save it but they use less so the is a saving, but for the moment they are very expensive and I ask do they need a lot more energy to produce, so the answer to your question could be that all things considered they are a waste of time and ENERGY
2007-03-26 08:36:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They use less watts to produce the same amount of light. For example a 25 watt bulb can be replaced by a bulb that uses 4 watts and produce the same amount of light
2007-03-26 10:00:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by getnightlife 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They use less electrical energy to provide an equivalent light output.
A 40 watt incandescent bulb can be replaced by an 11 watt low energy type.
Same light, less energy, so energy saved. (You have to switch it on to save though).
2007-03-26 08:41:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by efes_haze 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They produce less heat. However if an old type bulb is in the house the heat is not waisted anyway as it helps heat the house
2007-03-27 11:33:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by bwadsp 5
·
0⤊
0⤋