Is vegetarian better than non-veg. Is milk poison. Tell the truth for once & for all?

Answer 1

Vegetarian and non-vegetarian have got their own advantages and disadvantages. If you combine the foods in proportion both are nutritious. Milk is not a poison. It has good quality protein, vitamins, calcium, phosphorous, fat, and potassium. :

Answer 2

Is milk poison?
Humans are the only animals who drink another animals milk.
Think about that one for awhile and take from it what you want.

As far as veg vs non-veg, to each ones own. There is lots of evidence for both, which in a way discredits both.
There are many very old vegetarians and meat eaters in this world.

Everyone has an opinion but these questions should be handled by the experts, not the self-proclaimed experts.

Answer 3

Is vegetarian better than non-veg.

From: Soumya
Question: Is vegetarian better than non-veg. Is milk poison. Tell the truth for once & for all

Ans: Vegetarian and non-vegetarian have got their own advantages and disadvantages. If you combine the foods in proportion both are nutritious. Milk is not a poison. It has good quality protein, vitamins, calcium, phosphorous, fat, and potassium.

http://www.bawarchi.com/health/queries18.html#20

Answer 4

High fat diets are bad for the arteries so therefor it is better to be vegetarian and consume as little dairy products as possible. Milk is not poisonous.

Answer 5

Vegetarians isnt a better situation
they lack protein
your body runs on protein

let me sum it up :

EAT MEAT OR DIE SLOWLY

also :

Milk is NOT I reapeat NOT POISON

Answer 6

the best way to eat is as an omnivour like humans were made to be, just bcause you heard a rumor that milk was poison doesnt mean that the BIG BAD CORPORATIONS are hiding stuff from you, it just means that the lsd and weed have gotton to your brain or the chain tieing you to the tree is cutting off the circulation

Answer 7

I don't think either is better than the other, it's more about moderation and variation in what we consume.
Milk from a cow isn't meant for our bodies, it's meant for a calf, but again, in moderation it shouldn't do any harm.

Answer 8

Vegetarian!!!!! First off, nutritionally, the human body is not built to properly run on meat. We aren't equipped with many of the same biological indicators as carnivores or omnivores. Our teeth, the lack of certain enzymes, as well as our digestional tract all point to the fact that humans are designed to eat plants, not other animals. One has only to look at the LENGTH of our digestional tract to see that we shouldn't be putting meat in it. Animals that are "built" to eat meat have short tracts that have particular enzymes that work very quickly to pull nutrients out of the meat so that they can pass it out of their bodies before it begins to rot within them. Our bodies on the other hand hold on to what we eat much longer, and our digestion takes a considerable amount of time; it can be hours, or even days, before humans excrete the waste of the food that they ingested. During that time, the meat is actually putrefying within a person's body. People that eat an abundance of meat are much more likely to develop diseases and cancers related to the digestion/excretion systems. Diets high in meat also are associated with greatly increased risk of cardiovascular disease and death. I don't want to go on writing so much that no one will even read this, but when a person eats meat it's like putting the wrong type of fuel in a vehicle; sure, it may run on it, but in time it will cause it to break down and die because of it. I've been a total vegetarian for most of my life, a person does not NEED to eat meat; I've developed healthy, strong, and intelligent (Physically active, Captain of sports teams in High School, IQ over 160.) All of the nutrients we need can be found without killing an animal to get it. Protein, vitamins, even the much talked about Omega 3s can be found within a vegetarian diet.

As for milk, like meat, it does contain nutrients, but as with meat, our bodies aren't built to ingest it. (I assume you are talking about cow's milk.) Cow's milk is meant to be taken in by baby cows, human's milk by baby humans. Lactose, a substance found within cow's milk, is not easily broken down by the human body. Those that do best with tolerating & processing it are generally people of Northern and Western European descent; this is due to the fostered development of lactase over many centuries due to a long standing domestication of cows in this region. In other areas of the world, where different livestock were relied upon, lactose intolerance is more prevalent. Also, the adult human body does not need milk. In nature, mammals are generally weaned off milk (and that reliance upon the Mother as a nutritional source) once they are able to consume food and fend for it themselves.

As for it milk being poison... now, with the artificial growth hormones and high dose antibiotics given to dairy cows, yes it is poison. I don't believe that statement to be hyperbole. The effects are already being seen and studies continue showing that whatever we pump into livestock (cattle, cows, chickens, etc.) we consume. (Don't even get me started about the "genetic engineering.")

With all of that said, the reason I stopped eating meat was not for the nutritional benefits, but for moral reasons. There is nothing more selfish or repugnant than the taking of another's life.

Answer 9

i dont know which is better but i really dont believe milk is poison.even if we didnt drink cows milk they would still need to be milked.