Would Hitler have won world war 2 if it was taking place today, given what we know about his character?

Answer 1

Absolutely.

If the American military were limited in WW2 the way it is now, we would have been crushed.

We won against the toughest military opponent of all time, because we didn't hamstring our military.

Answer 2

Very difficult question to answer. Glad it occurred when it did. We did not have the liberal left screaming for pull out then.
I do believe it would have taken much more than Pearl Harbor to get the US into the conflict. Remember, it had been raging in Europe and Asia since 1939. We in this country didn't want to be involved other than furnishing arms to Brittan.
If the war was fought now, with the amount of Nukes we now have. Remember, it was Germany who perfected the first intercontinental missile V-2. It was they who had been working on the Nuclear bomb, and if now would have many nucs they could deliver on target.
Different time then. Different time now. If WWII had come now instead of then, we would be in a much more dire straits.If Hitler had played his cards right, we might be speaking German today. Yep, very difficult question.
It was the allies and treaties of WWI that caused the conditions in Germany that led to the rise of Hitler and subsequently WWII. Read history.

Answer 3

He certainly wouldn't have met the kind of resistance he did 60+ years ago. The Dems would have wanted to talk about why he didn't like the Jews. The UN would've debated countless mindless resolutions. All the while, this ruthless man would've continued his genocide.

At some point, the US either needs to decide that it wants to be great and consistently protect the weak and downtrodden, or that it wants to be weak and downtrodden and pander to whomever whines the loudest. We've been doing a great deal of the latter for the past 35 years.

Answer 4

Absolutely, he would have used spin.

Plus, who would there be to stop him?

America, no chance they are too busy fighting and losing against small counties.

Britain in the state it is now, again no chance.

The media would have lost the terrible things that happened to the Jews, and the appeasers would have brushed the holocaust under the carpet for expediencies sake.

It does not matter that a leader may be mad, it makes a change from super smooth bent incompetents.

Answer 5

Not a chance!
Hitler was a decorated young soldier in WW1, barely green behind his ears. Woodrow Wilson, our President, enabled him, to come to power, after humiliating a not even defeated Germany, with the sanctions of the peace thready of Versailles in 1919. (WW1, was started by Serbians, gunning down an Austrian prince). Germany, destroyed by sanctions, not by WW1, was in 1929, with 50% unemployment, people dying of hunger, vulnerable to the political ambitions of the Nazi party. Today, with Germany owning Europe, having best ties with China, they could buy the US, which costs less money then a war, but don't want the liability.

Answer 6

yes i think so. He would be like chuck norris I guess. everybody is saying no but thats because they already know hitler was bad but if nobody had heard of hitler and no one had ever tried to conquer the world and nearly succeed so the prospect would seem ridiculous, The circumstances would be alot different then people realise.

Answer 7

the Russian army is rust the Us Army has it's hands tied by the Liberals. Too bad he would have to get the weak and inbred German war boys together. All of the Men got Killed only the krap was left. Germany is a a neo France with a bad language.

Answer 8

not 'united states' yet 'international locations'. Allies - u.s., us of a, uk, France & (Nationalist) China - gained the conflict. for their labours they have been given the utmost place in the newly created UN, as (irreplaceable) everlasting contributors of the risk-free practices Council to supervise the international Peace. besides the shown fact that it does not mean that each and one and all different international locations have been bystanders observing a street-teach. on the Axis area have been Germany, Italy, Japan & some extra eu international locations like Romania & have been given defeated. different than the Latin American international locations, many extra different international locations via distinctive function of being colonies of those eu Powers (uk, Denmark, France, The Netherlands, Belgium, Italy) have been in contact in the conflict on the Allied area, via default. case in point the British have been straining to advance an Indian military of a few million scuffling with adult men, jointly as their Dominions Australia, Canada, new Zealand & South Africa fought on equivalent footing. among the international locations maximum adult men who fought & killed have been the Soviets (of u.s.) on Allied area, the Germans on the Axis area (adversaries) & Indians (India wasn't self sustaining then) on Allied area - in that order.

Answer 9

given what we know of hitler, i think it would be a war of wars, hitler would use deadlier chemicals to force his purification issues, he definatly fire nukes at the us and other out lining countries. i think hitler would be the altimate terrorist, i think he would still loose just because we would have even more countries than before standing with us, plus the UN.

Answer 10

he would win if the war were taking place today, not because of his character, but because of ours...liberalism has paralyzed this country's ability to wage war effectively...it is a very good thing indeed that particular conflict took place in the time it did.