2007-03-26 06:08:14 · 12 answers · asked by Demon slayer 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I believe there are but I want to know everyone's opinion.The bible is the absolute standard we shoud live by.
2007-03-26 06:13:17 · update #1
Yes the bible mentions ten of them, they are called the ten commandments.
2007-03-26 06:11:03 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are morals that go even beyond the bibles.
If you drink, smoke and or do any type of drug it conpromises your judgement and thought train. Your are more likly to do something or think something under the influence of a substance.
There is further revelation that creates a full abosolute moral.
Thats why mormons do not, drink, smoke or take anything that is harmfull into the body.
I testify that there is a abosulte covenant that requires more than what commitment the bible asks.
It says no where in the bible that there will be no further prophets, apostles or word.
A God who loves his children would not leave them without the priesthood nor would he leave them without revelation.
Those who will quote revelation 2- they are saying not to add to that book in particular-further more revelations was writtin before most of the bible but put as the last book in that order. Does that mean we should do away with half the bible?
I testify that there is a new ands everlasting convenant and as Christians it is our duty to search for truth and not be ignorant.
There is a challenge in the book of mormon that is a promise from God.
If there was a promise from God would you listen to it?
It says he who reads and asks God in the name of christ if these things be true. He will manifest it to you through the promptings of the holy ghost.
Bible Bible Bible <---why do people use this to deny what can help them the most? The spirit of the lord will guide in alll things.
2007-03-26 06:24:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say there are no absolute, universal or eternal truths. That said, some things last longer than others and morals change at a slow but observable rate. The real question for an atheist is: "What is the meaning of morality for Human Beings?" Ants have a different "morality" but we are not ants.
2007-03-26 06:21:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nicely, that's good judgment and our basic experience that leads us to our perception of desirable or incorrect. nicely, not in relation to Christianity. lol. that's what morals are. There are and by no skill would nicely be any info that teach something desirable or incorrect because of the fact it relies upon on the kind of life and the society wherein one lives in. To many human beings enable their own egocentric needs, bias, and uneducated notions create they own ethical code. they are guided via a dogmatic perception gadget which isn't accepting of latest adventure or findings. specific innovations in our international that we are able to appreciate are mathmatics. maximum folk evaluate mathmatics a absolute technology which would be unable to get replaced. that's greater on the 'actuality' chart because of the fact it runs universally united states to united states and is not in line with opinion and particularly on consistant evidence and prognosis. In our certainty they are absolute truths. which each and every have our own perception of certainty and certainty, besides the shown fact that, purely specific ones run universally and don't fail or replace into inconsistant in the face of analyze and sorting out. If any concept falls short or does not manage to be consisitant on a similar time as quickly as, it is not truly seen a actuality. In our international there are not many absolute truths, yet one element that's actual very some distance from being an absolute certainty is faith.
2016-11-23 16:58:44 · answer #4 · answered by maiale 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. No such thing as absolute morals. Right and wrong are just relative concepts defined differently according to which culture and circumstances you're in. Most people think killing is wrong, but it is glorified in times of war. Most people think incest is wrong, but my African friend told of me of a village where it is a socially sanctioned tradition for a father to take his daughter's virginity. Alot of people are against abortion, but even few of them think that a 12 year old girl whose pregnancy is the result of a rape should be forced to keep her child. I could go on, but you catch my drift. It's all relative.
2007-03-26 06:16:32 · answer #5 · answered by Subconsciousless 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the bible IS the absolute standard and the only absolute mortals are the living things that aren't human (except dogs, dogs are too cool to not have a soul)
2007-03-26 06:16:47 · answer #6 · answered by That one guy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not cosmically speaking.
morals have evolved for what is good for society. What allows us to live in peace and harmony.
I know killing is ethically and morally wrong. . not because it's written down in some book.
Did people before the bible know that killing was wrong?
Yes.
2007-03-26 06:14:26 · answer #7 · answered by KryptonOne 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IMO there are no "absolutes" in anything... but then I'm looking at it from a Buddhist/atheist philosophical perspective.
_()_
2007-03-26 06:13:23 · answer #8 · answered by vinslave 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes - any action that harms other people without justification is absolutely wrong.
2007-03-26 06:11:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not! ;-)
Seriously, I am a relativist.
2007-03-26 06:16:20 · answer #10 · answered by in a handbasket 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋