I can't resist answering this question. There is a dog called the rodhesian ridgeback that has been known to fight lions and baboons in packs and has on rare occassion beat them one on one.
This is rare as most dogs wouldn't survive that kind of fight. One thing to remember is dogs rarely fight one on one. Their standard is packs with 2, 3 or more harassing until the lion is tired and then they go in for the kill. They will use their advantages by outsmarting and trapping the other animals and use larger numbers to overwhelm.
In real life though most of these guys don't go after each other they go after the smaller game and will back down if they feel out matched.
2007-03-26 06:31:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Domestic dogs are generally larger and stronger than domestic cats. In no way does that indicate which animal is a better fighter (I'm guessing you wanted someone to say that).
In the wild, a Tiger or a Lion could and would easily kill and eat a Wolf (I'm guessing you wanted someone to say that too). (Wolves and Tigers / Lions don't share the same habitat)
A police officer would never fare well fighting crime with a well trained police cat, but a well trained police dog can easily take down a bad guy (I said that for myself).
2007-03-26 06:50:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ginbail © 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
You are discussing two different things - one is generalization, the other specifics. In general, the average dog (say a labrador) is stronger than the average cat (say your good ol' domestic short-hair). But, speaking specifics, yes, a lion would tear apart a wolf or hyena one on one. But I really think when people talk dog vs. cat, they are not including the "big cats" or wild dogs. They are discussing domestic breeds.
2007-03-26 06:15:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cats aren't strong, they just have deadly claws and can react quickly. Dogs have more endurance and can pull sleds. Cats (especially the big ones) sleep most of the day.
The strongest animals tend to be large herbivores like gorillas and horses.
2014-06-27 23:25:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Corey 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've never known anyone to have a Lion or a Tiger as a "household" pet. With that said I am yet to see a Tabby, Calico, or Persian cat pull a cart with 1,000 lbs of weight in it? Your therory is hogwash.
2007-03-26 06:16:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Beano 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the argument is usually about domestic pets.
Domestic cats are generally smaller then domestic dogs, unless you have one of those dogs you carry around in your handbag as an accessory because you are a moron.
2007-03-26 06:11:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by benpope81 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a size generalization. Most cats are smaller than most dogs, therefore dogs are stronger. It is not accurate, but it is hard to overcome.
2007-03-26 06:07:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by erinn83bis 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You shouldn't take the outlier-- the biggest, strongest, whatever-- and use it as an average of all things that are related to it. The largest body of water is more massive than the tallest mountain, so therefore all bodies of water are more massive than any land formation. Do you see how this completely falls apart?
2007-03-26 06:13:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Brian 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
they are thinking of domestic cats which are smaller than most dogs. But I had a cat that chased off a lab, a collie and several mutts in her life. It was funny. She was very fierce! I don't blame those chicken dogs for running lol .
2007-03-26 06:10:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Velvet 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because they are not comparing lions or tigers to dogs, they are comparing domesticated house cats to dogs.
There's the difference.
2007-03-26 06:08:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Audrey A 6
·
5⤊
0⤋