No, for many reasons. The most important is that they are completely the wrong cross sectional shape. They aren't designed to be used for thousands of miles either, so they are very soft, softer than racing tire compounds, so you could wear them out completely in a day of driving. They tend not to have tread and they aren't designed to pass drive to the road or endure high lateral loads.
So they'd be dangerous and they wouldn't last, if you could get them on to the car in the first place.
2007-03-26 05:35:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chris H 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
As you stated in your own question, why would you want to? Passenger vehicle tires are far better suited for passenger car use and are far less expensive. As another has stated, I doubt you could get one to fit anyway.
Regarding Scrappy's response: I sure can't disagree with your response, especially regarding the stability of an inert gas like nitrogen, however, I probably would have tried to be a little more tactful, I think.
It's certainly not my place to say what somebody should or shouldn't do or say, but most folks would probably agree that there's a better way to do it than personal attacks.
To each his own, though.
2007-03-26 15:07:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Squiggy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you can get them to fit a rim for your car, go for it. Different tires for different aircraft have different reqirements. They don't have tread for traction like a car tire, only circumferential grooves going around the tire. Jet tires would hold up i'd imagine. We wait till they're bald to change them. Landing beats them up a bit, going from 0 to over 100 kts in a second takes off the tread over time. Kind of like constantly doing burnouts in a car. Nitrogen doesn't explode, it's inert just like everyone else said. It expands and contracts very little compared to air under temperature change.
2007-03-27 01:57:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by JET_DOC 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are not approved by the DOT for "highway" use. Different standards apply. Aircraft tires have much different abuses than road tires and wouldn't handle the side-wall loads (from cornering). Additionally they are not at all designed for traction.
2007-03-26 05:23:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Drewpie 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
they are comparable to vehicle tires- they only have greater reinforcement cloth in them to tolerate the very extreme inflation pressures (over 200psi, approximately 6 cases the rigidity of a vehicle); extreme rotation speeds (as much as 250 mph/4 hundred km/h) and extreme brake temperatures (which convey approximately use of nitrogen instead of air for pressurization. The marvel absorption is from the landing kit oleo strut (oil crammed cylinder), not the tire- so for leaping autos you may desire landing kit. keep in mind that jetliners land in basic terms on advantageous delicate runways. vehicle tires equipped like plane tires could be smaller and narrower (greater rigidity) which could be great for gasoline economic device yet noisy and vicious driving (variety of like racing bike vs mountain bike tires).
2016-10-19 23:15:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I just wanted to reply to zach86e's comment. He is a freakin' idiot. Nitrogen is an inert Gas and does not explode. I use Nitrogen in my car tires. I use it because it is more stable than regular air in regards to having to service them. In fact NASCAR uses them in there Stock Cars.
2007-03-26 14:01:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
that is a negative, Aircraft tires are filled with nitrogen, and if you went 60 miles down the highway, at 70 they would explode, and take you with them. They are only approved for heavy abuse, short length, runway use.
2007-03-26 10:46:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
5⤋
are you kidding ? what type of car do you have ? And why not installing a turbofan on the rear platform of your SUV...
2007-03-26 09:43:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Danino 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that airplan ones are to big as well?
2007-03-26 06:06:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by thomaswheeler1991 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thank you for answering your own question.
2007-03-26 05:42:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋