I wasn't aware that he and the Iranian government were so tight? Please present your evidence?
2007-03-26 04:31:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Souris 5
·
6⤊
0⤋
we would desire to constantly bitchslap the British into submission. Dammit, declare to be for democracy, then flow throwing a defense force in each single place. they provide unfastened reign to Karl Marx and a gaggle of fascists, yet no longer to no longer hassle-free working human beings of their very own us of a. us of a is battling against the incorrect us of a. unfastened eire, unfastened Wales, unfastened Scotland, nuke Birmingham. Any us of a stupid adequate to start a war for 15 troops is (wait a minute, Germany did something comparable, so did Serbia presently)... properly, many extra brits have been captured and tried in places like Saudi Arabia besides, why no longer bomb them then? that's for the reason which you do no longer comprehend your history, isn't it...
2016-10-20 11:51:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What?! Why would kidnapping British soldiers help or hurt Bush? Your question makes no since.
2007-03-26 04:32:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by heidi t 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
Oh! So the Iranians have conspired with Bush to give him a reason to go to war on Iran? Is it just me or is this completely nonsensical?
2007-03-26 04:32:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Elizabeth Howard 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
Apparent to you, maybe, but I blame that on your tinfoil hat being too tight.
So just what PROOF do you have of this wild accusation, skippy? Any at all? Anything? Something? I bet not.....
Stop wasting our time.
2007-03-26 06:31:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Team Chief 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bush is angry because England has decided to pull their troops out of Iraq.
As he said, "If you're not with us, you're against us."
Thus, in Bush's weak little brain, England is now the enemy.
Tony Blair should be preparing his country for more frequent terrorist attacks, like the one we just had here in America and in Canada, where they laced pet food with rat poison right under Bush's nose.
Yet another terrorist attack under his oh-so-protective eyes, but this time on our pets.
Was he still reading "The Pet Goat."
.
2007-03-26 04:42:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Brotherhood 7
·
1⤊
4⤋
I wondered how long it would take for the tin foil hat crowd to run with this. You disappointed me its been a few days since this happened.
2007-03-26 04:32:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by meathookcook 6
·
6⤊
0⤋
Yeah... right. When are you wierd wacko liberals going to go away. You all get more off the wall idiotic each time you open your pie holes.
2007-03-26 04:32:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sane 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
I'll bet you believe in Santa Claus.
2007-03-26 04:31:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by tumbleweed1954 6
·
7⤊
0⤋
Your question seems so stupid at first. Then I realized what the government has orchestrated in the past. I wouldn't put it past" W" to do just that!
I don't think that's the case in this issue. "W "isn't smart enough.
2007-03-26 04:38:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jeff F 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
//Sarcasm on\\ Yes, AND he's watching you RIGHT NOW. Quick, put on your tinfoil hat, before he reads your thoughts! //Sarcasm off\\
Silly.
2007-03-26 04:32:40
·
answer #11
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
4⤊
0⤋