Blair lite. New Labour's answer to John Major.
My opinion is that Tony Blair is backing Milliband because he knows Cameron would walk all over him in an Election, and Cameron is one that Blair would really like to see succeeding him. Heaven help us if either of them become Prime Minister.
The thought of Brown as PM is bad enough, but he's far preferable to either of those two.
2007-03-25 22:45:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Spacephantom 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
This is the lunatic who is costing you and I thousands of pounds a year in 'Global Warming' taxes and strategies.
Global warming is a fake, and if this devious, dishonest little moron, had to prove the science in a court of law, it would expose it as pure sciencefiction.
16,000 CHILDREN A DAY DIE OF STARVATION, and that figure will be dwarfed as a direct result of politicians playing at being green.
Climate change has always happened and it was warmer a thousand years ago than it is now. Milliband is like Blair and Brown, a con artist.
New Labour is led by two B's and the Tories by a C.
God help us!
2007-03-26 05:53:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by bicballpoint 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Goof Ball
2007-03-30 02:41:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by carpentershammerer 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
He seems to be a younger version of Tony Blair. It doesn't say much for the state of British politics when the choice for the next Prime Minister is between David Cameron, Gordon Brown and David Miliband. (That's if he eventually decides to stand.)
2007-03-26 05:28:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by shy_voo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Having read some of the things he has been coming out with about the environment etc,etc he seems to be inflated with an undue sense of his own importance. Like many more in Westminster he is not half as clever as he thinks he is. A great deal of what he says is hot air and the rest is just the usual 'gobbledygook'
2007-03-26 06:27:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rob Roy 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Has it occurred to anyone that Blair wants someone to replace him who stands no chance of being re-elected at the next General Election? His "legacy" right now is shattered because of Iraq, etc., etc., etc., BUT if the Tories are elected next time around he can claim, "Labour lost because they forced me to stand down. With me remaining leader we would have won."
The reason he is anti-Brown is because he knows Brown has a better than slim chance of prevailing at the next election.
2007-03-26 05:55:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rainman 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
We may as well put the tories into power. At least they won't wreck the traditions of the labour party any further.
2007-03-26 05:42:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
David Milliband.....Robotic Blair clone...curtain twitching interfering rich suburbanite,who wants to tell us all how we should live our lives....I mean...who the fukk listens to this fool anyway....just who does he think he is...who rattled his cage. I would ask all sensible people,to completely ignore this knobhead....before we have him in charge of the New Labour nobility and Prime Minister of Rip-Off Britain....just say no to these people....and keep saying no,until they get the message
2007-03-26 10:38:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by stef8705 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Goof...even worse than Ebeneezer Broon... why dont they give the job to Mohammed Sarwar - what more could Labour ask for ... a left wing Glaswegian Muslim Mi££ionaire, as PM...
2007-03-26 10:24:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
goof he got no fight, its his turn to stand a give it 2 gordon, cause thats what they agreed. like him letting blair stand in 97'.
its a hoax what we want makes no difference!
peace.
2007-03-26 05:32:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋