English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Hey guys. I will have meeting tomorrow with politics students from other institutions. What you think is the best practical resolution for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
Bearing in mind that Israel came into being 1948, so we cannot neglect Palestinian and we cannot wipe out Israel from the map. Also, bear in mind that Hamas, which is in power, now is not in the UN list of terrorist organisation, whereas it is in our list in UK and USA. Many people think that Hamas was only representing the self-defence right. Any let us go back to the question,


**What the resolution that tomorrow in our UN meeting win over-all majority for the Israel-Palestinian conflict. Please support your resolution with reasonable persuasive reasons and facts to convince other delegates.

Thanks alot,
Angel

2007-03-25 20:40:37 · 9 answers · asked by Lovly.Angel 1 in News & Events Current Events

9 answers

I give you three approaches, if backed by all players (Iran, Syria, US, UK, UN & all the factions), would lead to the biggest decline in killings there:

A. partition into 2-3 different states with each contractually obliged to share 1% of its GDP with the others according to population percentages & able to keep the rest

B. a loose-alliance federal Palestine with very little federal legislation - most things being resolved at the province level - only when at least 22 of 27 provinces agree do laws become nationwide & appointments altered (obviously Jews & Palestines would be the majority population in at leat 10 provinces each)

C. partition into 5-20 units, at first, some based on having one main group in power and others based on having power-sharing, who could then form larger states if they agree to a joint constitution, based on the idea of trying to give each faction a home state at first, which they must defend in elections (this might lead to the formation of a Hamas state, a Fatah state, an ultraorthodox state & a Labour party state)

D . a united Palestine with no account taken of ethnicity or religion in the electoral system - all residents of Gaza & the West Bank are given an equal vote as all Israelis have

E. one Palestine with Jews & non-Jews each electing their own chamber of parliament & all changes requiring the consent of both chambers to become law

F. 25% of seats in parliament go to the top 5 Jewish parties (counting Jewish votes only);
25% of seats in parliament go to the top five non-Jewish parties counting non-Jewish votes;
25% of seats in parliament go to the top three Jewish parties counting non-Jewish votes
25% of seats in parliament go to the top three non-Jewish parties counting Jewish votes
(a system to encourage parties to seek the support of both sides)

2007-03-25 22:36:48 · answer #1 · answered by Wise Kai 3 · 0 1

I think we do need to encourage more restrain from Israel while negotiating cease fire/temp peace deals. Israel blowing up in anger every now and then can quickly erase any progress very fast. USA currently is too compliant with Israel's military actions. It will be very difficult, but having UN or some other outside force handle Hamas aggression toward Israel might be better idea then Israelis incursion into Palestine and have Israel show more restrain.

Perhaps some type of grass root effort to build some relationship between Palestine people and Israelis? But I don't know how one could do that without getting blown up.

2007-03-25 23:18:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

to reli and jack!! before the 1st international conflict Palestine became a district ruled by utilising the Turkish Ottoman Empire. The Ottomans have been defeated by utilising Britain and her allies contained in the conflict. After WW1 Britain took administration of Palestine, yet there have been many problems between the Arabs who lived there and Jews who wanted to stay there too. After the 2nd international conflict, Britain desperate to enable the United countries % what to do with Palestine. The United countries reported keeping apart Palestine into 2 international locations, one Arab and one Jewish. The Arab leaders reported no to the plan, however the Jewish leaders regular it and declared the state of Israel. The President of usa gave his help to the hot state. by way of fact then Israel has set up many Jewish settlements - communities, some tiny, some as vast as small cities - in the two the West economic employer and the Gaza Strip. those settlements are considered unlawful below international regulation, even although Israel would not trust this.

2016-10-01 12:15:46 · answer #3 · answered by linnon 4 · 0 0

Until the Israeli terrorists give back land that was illegally siezed in the six day war-and give Palestinians equal rights-then there is no chance of a resolution-especially while rich Jews across the world continue to pour money in to shore up the defences of a sham state which ignores the existence of it's indigenous population!!
The road map to peace should be renamed the road map to seizure of global oil production-FACT!!

2007-03-25 22:11:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

march arround the walls beating drums and blowing horns
the wall fall down then go homer and let israel go bankrupt ,
really there is only one option impeach the liar who said he would make peace but lied
decieved all the people again
what would sharron think
he is still on life support
whats up with that?
is it like that guy they kept intact in russia or what?
the warrior has been and seen done his labours why keep him from his reward?
its not that prophecy about ; the stars of sharon and media
[ie con rad black] falling?

2007-03-25 22:28:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

So Israel wants to be known as a state, simple lift them up from there and take them one of the states of america, im sure no one will bother them there, they can live right under Bush's bushes.

If they refused to be removed from Palestine then i suggest sanctions on Israel take away all the weapons of mass destruction, ( as the world know they have killed many,totally destroyed homes,villages,)

Lets see them fight with stones as the palestinians have done,

2007-03-25 21:10:53 · answer #6 · answered by Ascetic 3 · 2 2

tell the palestians to concentrate on building their country instead of being more concerned with Israel.

Education, Education, Education, give the kids an education instead of a bomb to carry.

2007-03-26 00:00:44 · answer #7 · answered by Abdul 5 · 0 0

I'm not sure the ordinary person in the outside world is really sure what either side wants.

2007-03-25 21:03:24 · answer #8 · answered by Barbara Doll to you 7 · 0 1

no chance to resolve

waste of time even debating it

2007-03-25 20:44:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers