My fellow yahoo political junkies.... What do you think when a person....?

Question

This is all about one person, who always answers questions on this site.

1. Claim to democrat.
2. Claim to be a moderate Republican.
3. Claims to support Obama
4. Claims to support Ron Paul
5. Claims that President Bush does not like black people
6. Tells someone they are using disgusting politics when they call Nancy Pellosi ugly.
7. Thinks that when some is talking about a social entitlement program that they are referring to getting rid of the FDA.
8. Uses the term Jews/Neocons as the same type of people
9. Claims to have never been out debated.

Really I look forward to ready what they might say next, but I find it how funny everyone false for their politics of the momment.

Answer 1

1 and 2 contradict. You can't be Democrat and moderate Republican.

3 and 4 contradict. Obama is more of a cult of personality. He's the type of guy you'd like to be around. Ron Paul is more of a legitimte leader.

To claim that Bush doesn't like black people is probably absurd. While I don't like the president, I don't think he's anywhere near a racist.

I don't think its disgusting politics to declare somebody ugly. That has nothing to do with whether they're qualified to hold office.

The FDA isn't a Social Entitlement program. It's a cartel.

Neocons are former Democrats who grew disillusioned with what it turned during the 60s. They were called Paleoliberal until they switched to the GOP. It has nothing to do with antisemitism.

A claim to have never been out debated is possible, but unlikely.

People don't look up somebody's history of answers when evaluating comments. Answers are judged on their content themselves, which is a good thing.

This may be 2 people on the same account. It may also be somebody who just wants to disagree with everybody (what some people on the Internet call a "troll") or somebody who wants to agree with everybody (in the hope of getting lots of best answers).

Answer 2

in basic terms have been given stated as quickly as for a stupid reason, i replaced into going to attraction it, yet different solutions stated they only enable captivating to sound honest. I advise possibly it befell some cases, yet i think of they have been kidding. in basic terms bypass alongside with it, examine the guiellines and words of provider in basic terms IN CASE, then delete your digital mail speaking approximately it. anybody gets stated specifically situations, and it;'s often for stupid motives, if any.