English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Was it fought under the mandate of heaven? Seems like it was a little too perfectly done. Must have had some help from above. So, how come they missed George and Dickey?

2007-03-25 19:13:47 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

You're full of it and you know it, pal.

2007-03-25 19:21:48 · answer #1 · answered by greβ 6 · 1 1

A good battle? How is it a battle if you are attacking unarmed non-combatants without provocation? So, by your reasoning if I beat your mother (a perfect stranger to me) to death for my own vague reasons without warning or cause that would be a battle as well?
Well, they killed a fair number of men, women and children on the planes and in the buildings, innocent civilians just going about their lives, so I would imagine that they are condemned for all eternity. Some of those killed were also Muslims. Islam does not look kindly on the slaughter of innocents, as most religions condemn such behavior. Religious fanatics of course feel that they can justify almost any behavior by picking and choosing what parts of their particular holy text to adhere to.

I am not sure of your intentions, but this is not something to be made light of or joked about.

2007-03-25 19:30:11 · answer #2 · answered by slipstreamer 7 · 0 0

It seemed perfectly done because they had 20 people preparing for 12 years. But it still didn't go off right. The plane that his the strongest wall of the Pentagon was supposed to hit the White House but they couldn't find it. The one that crashed in PA was supposed to hit the Capital building in D.C. but those pilots were total idiots. Anyway I wouldn't give to much credit to Allah, and these guys were fighting unarmed civilians in a country at peace. Not too hard. Look how many times they hit us since....

2007-03-25 19:20:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No, 9-11 was not a "good Muslim battle." It showed the cold, callous nature of Islamic fundamentalism, that has no regard for the lives of innocent men, women and children, whatever the cost. Their leadership in al Qaeda is depleted, in jail, or in hiding, and they will be caught and their judgment awaits them regardless who is in office in the US. That is the single, most factor that will always unite this country, regardless of party. Whether it takes 10 or 20 years or longer, 9-11 will be fully avenged.

2007-03-25 19:23:18 · answer #4 · answered by gone 6 · 1 0

You call 9-1-1 a "battle." The slaughter of 3,000 innocent men, women and children hardly qualifies as a battle.

2007-03-25 19:18:06 · answer #5 · answered by Chug-a-Lug 7 · 3 0

Right Shrub was reading "My Pet Goat" while the country was under attack and if you read the PNAC manifesto they talk about a Pearl Harbor invasion to implement a muscular foreign policy....

2007-03-25 20:02:28 · answer #6 · answered by nicewknd 5 · 0 0

Perhaps you're not considering the possibility that they were receiving help from below and not above. My perception of a Godly action doesn't include the murder of innocents.

2007-03-25 19:19:52 · answer #7 · answered by Crystal Blue Persuasion 5 · 2 0

I'm confused by your question...

Are you asking if terrorists really flew planes into buildings and killed thousands of innocent people, or are you asking if it was an inside job?

I'll guess that you're asking the first one.

Yes, terrorists did fly planes into buildings and killed thousands of innocent people.

2007-03-25 19:18:15 · answer #8 · answered by The Cult of Personality 5 · 2 0

It would be more accurate to say it was fought under the guise.

2007-03-25 19:17:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

9/11 was the most victorious battle ever won by Muslims in the modern world and it affected many countries to believe that Islam is real totalitarian religion ready to conquer the world.

2007-03-25 19:18:43 · answer #10 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers