Would you favor the abolition of abortion?
The way the ruling are worded right now, we'd have to.
2007-03-25 18:34:34 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Frag: You might want to consider the way you word that. I take it from your tone that you are pro-choice, but from the way you word it, abortion is not valid. After all, medicine CAN sustain human life from conception... it just requires a mother's womb.
2007-03-25 18:40:06 · update #1
Murder has been occuring since th B.C. times.... might want to focus your argument a little there.
2007-03-25 19:01:58 · update #2
Just so you know, more than 1/3 of the abortions that occur world-wide happen in places where they are illegal. Do I think that banning it would prevent the from occuring? No. Would it cause women to use less safe methods and put women in a unsanitary and unsafe environment and put her life in the hands of some slimeball? Yes.
Do I like abortion? No. Would I do it myself? No.
I do however realize that abortions have been occuring since the B.C. times...so sorry to burst your bubble, but it will never change.
EDIT: True, "murder" has been going on since BC times, and yes it is still going on now. So, how is my point any less valid? My argument is airtight, however, your perceptual problems are not my fault. Noone is forcing you to have an abortion, and noone is forcing you to participate in one...so what is your problem?
2007-03-25 18:56:17 · answer #1 · answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Abortion is valid if there is nothing that medicine could do to sustain a human life from conception.
2007-03-25 18:38:29 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes as long as sustaining a fertilized embryo can be maintained outside the womb...
2007-03-29 15:21:03 · answer #3 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-03-25 18:37:21 · answer #4 · answered by freemanbac 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
nice t its.
2007-03-25 18:39:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋