English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

I have read the most recent answers to your question, and I love how the haters all dressed up as liberals and so called patriots keep insisting on the lie that saddam either didn't have any, or that he got them from us. Perhaps they would like to explain just when and how he received poison gas munitions from us. I would like to see some of these so-called receipts they are so proud of. The fact is he had since the end of the first gulf war to hide, or displace his chemical weapons. Notice how nobody seems to remember that?
What the haters will never admit, and what the liberal toadies of the press will never publish is the fact that saddam had wmds and was able to secure them in syria, and lebanon. You have to remember that saddam made records of everything. There are hundreds of hours of tapes and thousands of pages of documents that are still being deciphered. " In a tape dating to April 1995, saddam and several aides discuss the fact that U.N. inspectors had found traces of Iraq's biological weapons program. On the tape hussein kamel, saddam's son-in-law is heard gloating about fooling the inspectors[ We did not reveal all that we have, not the type of weapons, not the volume of the materials we imported, not the volume of the production we told them about, not the volume of use. None of this was correct.]".
Then of course there is the story of Georges Sada, don't remember him? Of course not, got that good old selective memory going for ya. He was saddam's number two man in what was left of hussein's air force, who wrote a book called "saddam's secrets". He's been singing like a canary to keep his hide in one piece. His book describes in detail how saddam used trucks, commercial jets. and ships to move WMDs to Syria pretending that all that cargo was to help Syrian "flood victims" with the help of Russian Spetsnaz (special ops.) that were sent to Iraq to move weaponry and eradicate all traces of its existence.
Once again I repeat, and demand that the haters that would love to see this country go down, reveal these so-called receipts for WMD munitions that were bought from the russians in the first place, or, don't you have the goods, just the lie?

2007-03-25 19:08:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The sarin and mustard gas artillery shells discovered in 2004 were poorly hid, by it's like someone thought they would have been marked with a big flag or something saying "UN VIOLATION HERE!" Pat Boone has pretty well covered this issue. There also was a special ops man who located 4 concrete bunker complexes that actually ran under the Tigris River, but could get no one to excavate it in teh early phases of teh occupation and when he returned found them opened and empty. A top Iraqi general under Saddam has just published a book and describes how the WMDs were loaded onto a 747 and several 727s sent to Syria disguised as more "flood aid. And then there were teh Russian Spetsnatz or "special forces" that truck convoyed stuff out to Iran and Syria ahead of our ground forces. Whole facilities that UN weapons inspectors had visited and inspected equipment in had been stripped bare, in some cases freshly demolished and trucked away, before those areas were secured. Nope, nothing suspicious at all. It's one reason impeaching Bush for "lying" about WMDs would blow up in democrats faces, and WHY IT WON'T HAPPEN. Democrats lied, and now more people are gonna die because the enemy knows they have already won effective August 2008, and Iran was thus encouraged to kidknap sailors and do anything else they feel like.

2007-03-25 17:56:51 · answer #2 · answered by theshadowknows 5 · 2 1

He had about 3 years.

2007-03-25 18:04:14 · answer #3 · answered by jdkilp 7 · 0 0

Actually the US has the recipt for every WMD that was sold. Funny how the US chooses to attack an unarmed country. Why not go after the country the terrorist were really from Saudi Arabia?

Woops....I forgot Pappy was doing business with the Bin Ladens on 9/11......

2007-03-25 17:46:20 · answer #4 · answered by nicewknd 5 · 3 3

nicely, i think of that's great which you're searching for suggestion in this subject rely as maximum babies are having intercourse early as 13 and that they simply arent mature. My suggestion isnt for a non secular attitude or being bias. i think of you will desire to do what you think of is nice for you. I continuously have faith you will desire to keep your self for the guy you quite love and which you quite have faith love you aswell. I dont think of you're too youthful in case you're in a commmited dating as in longer than 6 months and take ideal precautions. in case you arent on start administration i want to advise beginning it and arranged 3 months after. And for the guy to continuously, continuously use condoms. no rely how lots you like one yet another, you dont want a sprint one or different circumstances. look after your self and the guy your sexually lively with. in case you settle on you're actually not waiting, dont pass with the aid of with it! and once you're waiting, take it sluggish. yet, as quickly as you contain intercourse it does replace the dating. and specific, intercourse would nicely be a great element besides the shown fact that it may additionally harm your heart. purely be risk-free and play risk-free. terrific needs.

2016-11-23 15:58:28 · answer #5 · answered by briana 4 · 0 0

I'd say he had longer than that. I'm sure he had a safe place even when Clinton bombed Iraq in '98.

2007-03-25 18:35:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Of course we know Hussein had WMDs. We still have the receipts! Doesn't anyone remember when he was our friend for fighting the Iranians back in the '80s? We sold him the weapons he was executed for using.
Are you listening, Mr. Cheney?

2007-03-25 17:49:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

He managed to hide the entire "massive"stockpile?
Where?
And how did he slip them past what was the most intense military surveillance since the Cold War?

2007-03-25 17:50:20 · answer #8 · answered by Zapatta McFrench 5 · 1 2

Excellent point, my friend. I still maintain former Iraqi WMD are simply now Syrian or North Korean WMD.

2007-03-25 17:44:15 · answer #9 · answered by Rick N 5 · 3 4

Figures from a pot question you degenerate to further vice.
No Saddam never had any wmd,s ...America was sold a pack of lies...even Bush has come clean about it...why can't his followers?

2007-03-25 17:45:24 · answer #10 · answered by dstr 6 · 5 5

fedest.com, questions and answers